)]}'
{
  "commit": "7ed40918a386afc2e14a6d3da563ea6d13686c25",
  "tree": "e180ba59fa65290a12a731aaf304d2aa840f3ffb",
  "parents": [
    "9b847548663ef1039dd49f0eb4463d001e596bc3"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Linus Torvalds",
    "email": "torvalds@g5.osdl.org",
    "time": "Fri Jan 06 08:43:16 2006 -0800"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Linus Torvalds",
    "email": "torvalds@g5.osdl.org",
    "time": "Fri Jan 06 08:43:16 2006 -0800"
  },
  "message": "x86: remove bogus \u0027pci\u003dusepirqmask\u0027 suggestion when no irq is defined\n\nThis was harmless, but for the case of a device that had no irq\npre-defined we would incorrectly suggest that \"usepirqmask\" might make a\ndifference.  It never would, and the message was just confusing people.\n\nReported in the dmesg of Etienne Lorrain.\n\nSigned-off-by: Linus Torvalds \u003ctorvalds@osdl.org\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "19e6f4871d1e7d09bace430522315c5e25fafff9",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "arch/i386/pci/irq.c",
      "new_id": "ee8e01697d96c6a0cb9c5a5a3365d202417ec43d",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "arch/i386/pci/irq.c"
    }
  ]
}
