|  | Deferred IO | 
|  | ----------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | Deferred IO is a way to delay and repurpose IO. It uses host memory as a | 
|  | buffer and the MMU pagefault as a pretrigger for when to perform the device | 
|  | IO. The following example may be a useful explanation of how one such setup | 
|  | works: | 
|  |  | 
|  | - userspace app like Xfbdev mmaps framebuffer | 
|  | - deferred IO and driver sets up fault and page_mkwrite handlers | 
|  | - userspace app tries to write to mmaped vaddress | 
|  | - we get pagefault and reach fault handler | 
|  | - fault handler finds and returns physical page | 
|  | - we get page_mkwrite where we add this page to a list | 
|  | - schedule a workqueue task to be run after a delay | 
|  | - app continues writing to that page with no additional cost. this is | 
|  | the key benefit. | 
|  | - the workqueue task comes in and mkcleans the pages on the list, then | 
|  | completes the work associated with updating the framebuffer. this is | 
|  | the real work talking to the device. | 
|  | - app tries to write to the address (that has now been mkcleaned) | 
|  | - get pagefault and the above sequence occurs again | 
|  |  | 
|  | As can be seen from above, one benefit is roughly to allow bursty framebuffer | 
|  | writes to occur at minimum cost. Then after some time when hopefully things | 
|  | have gone quiet, we go and really update the framebuffer which would be | 
|  | a relatively more expensive operation. | 
|  |  | 
|  | For some types of nonvolatile high latency displays, the desired image is | 
|  | the final image rather than the intermediate stages which is why it's okay | 
|  | to not update for each write that is occurring. | 
|  |  | 
|  | It may be the case that this is useful in other scenarios as well. Paul Mundt | 
|  | has mentioned a case where it is beneficial to use the page count to decide | 
|  | whether to coalesce and issue SG DMA or to do memory bursts. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Another one may be if one has a device framebuffer that is in an usual format, | 
|  | say diagonally shifting RGB, this may then be a mechanism for you to allow | 
|  | apps to pretend to have a normal framebuffer but reswizzle for the device | 
|  | framebuffer at vsync time based on the touched pagelist. | 
|  |  | 
|  | How to use it: (for applications) | 
|  | --------------------------------- | 
|  | No changes needed. mmap the framebuffer like normal and just use it. | 
|  |  | 
|  | How to use it: (for fbdev drivers) | 
|  | ---------------------------------- | 
|  | The following example may be helpful. | 
|  |  | 
|  | 1. Setup your structure. Eg: | 
|  |  | 
|  | static struct fb_deferred_io hecubafb_defio = { | 
|  | .delay		= HZ, | 
|  | .deferred_io	= hecubafb_dpy_deferred_io, | 
|  | }; | 
|  |  | 
|  | The delay is the minimum delay between when the page_mkwrite trigger occurs | 
|  | and when the deferred_io callback is called. The deferred_io callback is | 
|  | explained below. | 
|  |  | 
|  | 2. Setup your deferred IO callback. Eg: | 
|  | static void hecubafb_dpy_deferred_io(struct fb_info *info, | 
|  | struct list_head *pagelist) | 
|  |  | 
|  | The deferred_io callback is where you would perform all your IO to the display | 
|  | device. You receive the pagelist which is the list of pages that were written | 
|  | to during the delay. You must not modify this list. This callback is called | 
|  | from a workqueue. | 
|  |  | 
|  | 3. Call init | 
|  | info->fbdefio = &hecubafb_defio; | 
|  | fb_deferred_io_init(info); | 
|  |  | 
|  | 4. Call cleanup | 
|  | fb_deferred_io_cleanup(info); |