x86: also show non-zero IRQ counts for vectors that currently don't have a handler
It doesn't seem to make sense to hide these, even if their counts
can't change at the point in time they're being displayed.
[ tglx: arch/x86 adaptation ]
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c
index 3881189..6b5c730 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c
@@ -62,9 +62,17 @@
}
if (i < NR_IRQS) {
+ unsigned any_count = 0;
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_desc[i].lock, flags);
+#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
+ any_count = kstat_irqs(i);
+#else
+ for_each_online_cpu(j)
+ any_count |= kstat_cpu(j).irqs[i];
+#endif
action = irq_desc[i].action;
- if (!action)
+ if (!action && !any_count)
goto skip;
seq_printf(p, "%3d: ",i);
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -76,9 +84,11 @@
seq_printf(p, " %8s", irq_desc[i].chip->name);
seq_printf(p, "-%-8s", irq_desc[i].name);
- seq_printf(p, " %s", action->name);
- for (action=action->next; action; action = action->next)
- seq_printf(p, ", %s", action->name);
+ if (action) {
+ seq_printf(p, " %s", action->name);
+ while ((action = action->next) != NULL)
+ seq_printf(p, ", %s", action->name);
+ }
seq_putc(p, '\n');
skip:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_desc[i].lock, flags);