)]}'
{
  "commit": "1af3ed3ddf27499c3f57662c4c29871e2b95e5f9",
  "tree": "12e478c9ae078aa7efd8675564cffeb34708d074",
  "parents": [
    "baa8c1102f0cd86e69c1497d61d2ee177e663663"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Peter Zijlstra",
    "email": "a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl",
    "time": "Wed Dec 23 15:10:31 2009 +0100"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Ingo Molnar",
    "email": "mingo@elte.hu",
    "time": "Thu Jan 21 13:40:13 2010 +0100"
  },
  "message": "sched: Unify load_balance{,_newidle}()\n\nload_balance() and load_balance_newidle() look remarkably similar, one\nkey point they differ in is the condition on when to active balance.\n\nSo split out that logic into a separate function.\n\nOne side effect is that previously load_balance_newidle() used to fail\nand return -1 under these conditions, whereas now it doesn\u0027t. I\u0027ve not\nyet fully figured out the whole -1 return case for either\nload_balance{,_newidle}().\n\nSigned-off-by: Peter Zijlstra \u003ca.p.zijlstra@chello.nl\u003e\nLKML-Reference: \u003cnew-submission\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Ingo Molnar \u003cmingo@elte.hu\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "65d08207e925d99323c7cc2b5356afaac699a140",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "kernel/sched_fair.c",
      "new_id": "10408323794e1e79adf53b262fb61a75d323ed2c",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "kernel/sched_fair.c"
    }
  ]
}