[TCP]: Correct DSACK check placing
Previously one of the in-block skip branches was missing it.
Also, drop it from tail-fully-processed case because the next
iteration will do exactly the same thing, i.e., process the
SACK block that contains the DSACK information.
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 3ad6a19..79996b1 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -1554,20 +1554,15 @@
}
/* Rest of the block already fully processed? */
- if (!after(end_seq, cache->end_seq)) {
- skb = tcp_maybe_skipping_dsack(skb, sk, next_dup, cache->end_seq,
- &fack_count, &reord, &flag);
+ if (!after(end_seq, cache->end_seq))
goto advance_sp;
- }
+
+ skb = tcp_maybe_skipping_dsack(skb, sk, next_dup, cache->end_seq,
+ &fack_count, &reord, &flag);
/* ...tail remains todo... */
if (TCP_SKB_CB(tp->highest_sack)->end_seq == cache->end_seq) {
- /* ...but better entrypoint exists! Check that DSACKs are
- * properly accounted while skipping here
- */
- tcp_maybe_skipping_dsack(skb, sk, next_dup, cache->end_seq,
- &fack_count, &reord, &flag);
-
+ /* ...but better entrypoint exists! */
skb = tcp_write_queue_next(sk, tp->highest_sack);
fack_count = tp->fackets_out;
cache++;