threadgroup: rename signal->threadgroup_fork_lock to ->group_rwsem
Make the following renames to prepare for extension of threadgroup
locking.
* s/signal->threadgroup_fork_lock/signal->group_rwsem/
* s/threadgroup_fork_read_lock()/threadgroup_change_begin()/
* s/threadgroup_fork_read_unlock()/threadgroup_change_end()/
* s/threadgroup_fork_write_lock()/threadgroup_lock()/
* s/threadgroup_fork_write_unlock()/threadgroup_unlock()/
This patch doesn't cause any behavior change.
-v2: Rename threadgroup_change_done() to threadgroup_change_end() per
KAMEZAWA's suggestion.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Menage <paul@paulmenage.org>
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index 6545fd6..b409df3 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -2003,8 +2003,8 @@
* @cgrp: the cgroup to attach to
* @leader: the threadgroup leader task_struct of the group to be attached
*
- * Call holding cgroup_mutex and the threadgroup_fork_lock of the leader. Will
- * take task_lock of each thread in leader's threadgroup individually in turn.
+ * Call holding cgroup_mutex and the group_rwsem of the leader. Will take
+ * task_lock of each thread in leader's threadgroup individually in turn.
*/
int cgroup_attach_proc(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *leader)
{
@@ -2030,8 +2030,8 @@
* step 0: in order to do expensive, possibly blocking operations for
* every thread, we cannot iterate the thread group list, since it needs
* rcu or tasklist locked. instead, build an array of all threads in the
- * group - threadgroup_fork_lock prevents new threads from appearing,
- * and if threads exit, this will just be an over-estimate.
+ * group - group_rwsem prevents new threads from appearing, and if
+ * threads exit, this will just be an over-estimate.
*/
group_size = get_nr_threads(leader);
/* flex_array supports very large thread-groups better than kmalloc. */
@@ -2249,7 +2249,6 @@
cgroup_unlock();
return -ESRCH;
}
-
/*
* even if we're attaching all tasks in the thread group, we
* only need to check permissions on one of them.
@@ -2273,9 +2272,9 @@
}
if (threadgroup) {
- threadgroup_fork_write_lock(tsk);
+ threadgroup_lock(tsk);
ret = cgroup_attach_proc(cgrp, tsk);
- threadgroup_fork_write_unlock(tsk);
+ threadgroup_unlock(tsk);
} else {
ret = cgroup_attach_task(cgrp, tsk);
}