)]}'
{
  "commit": "30d7a4836847bdb10b32c78a4879d4aebe0f193b",
  "tree": "039d4eaec57d67cbfc49d92f12e592b46c251c01",
  "parents": [
    "09cd9270ea52e0f9851528e8ed028073f96b3c34"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "NeilBrown",
    "email": "neilb@suse.de",
    "time": "Fri Dec 23 09:57:00 2011 +1100"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "NeilBrown",
    "email": "neilb@suse.de",
    "time": "Fri Dec 23 09:57:00 2011 +1100"
  },
  "message": "md/raid5: ensure correct assessment of drives during degraded reshape.\n\nWhile reshaping a degraded array (as when reshaping a RAID0 by first\nconverting it to a degraded RAID4) we currently get confused about\nwhich devices are in_sync.  In most cases we get it right, but in the\nregion that is being reshaped we need to treat non-failed devices as\nin-sync when we have the data but haven\u0027t actually written it out yet.\n\nReported-by: Adam Kwolek \u003cadam.kwolek@intel.com\u003e\nSigned-off-by: NeilBrown \u003cneilb@suse.de\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "31670f8d6b65789c071c1fd8d212c168138e14d8",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "drivers/md/raid5.c",
      "new_id": "858fdbb7eb07a24ceb18a4d6214218c9205089e7",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "drivers/md/raid5.c"
    }
  ]
}
