| /* | 
 |  *  linux/arch/m32r/semaphore.c | 
 |  *    orig : i386 2.6.4 | 
 |  * | 
 |  *  M32R semaphore implementation. | 
 |  * | 
 |  *	Copyright (c) 2002 - 2004 Hitoshi Yamamoto | 
 |  */ | 
 |  | 
 | /* | 
 |  * i386 semaphore implementation. | 
 |  * | 
 |  * (C) Copyright 1999 Linus Torvalds | 
 |  * | 
 |  * Portions Copyright 1999 Red Hat, Inc. | 
 |  * | 
 |  *	This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or | 
 |  *	modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License | 
 |  *	as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version | 
 |  *	2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. | 
 |  * | 
 |  * rw semaphores implemented November 1999 by Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org> | 
 |  */ | 
 | #include <linux/sched.h> | 
 | #include <linux/err.h> | 
 | #include <linux/init.h> | 
 | #include <asm/semaphore.h> | 
 |  | 
 | /* | 
 |  * Semaphores are implemented using a two-way counter: | 
 |  * The "count" variable is decremented for each process | 
 |  * that tries to acquire the semaphore, while the "sleeping" | 
 |  * variable is a count of such acquires. | 
 |  * | 
 |  * Notably, the inline "up()" and "down()" functions can | 
 |  * efficiently test if they need to do any extra work (up | 
 |  * needs to do something only if count was negative before | 
 |  * the increment operation. | 
 |  * | 
 |  * "sleeping" and the contention routine ordering is protected | 
 |  * by the spinlock in the semaphore's waitqueue head. | 
 |  * | 
 |  * Note that these functions are only called when there is | 
 |  * contention on the lock, and as such all this is the | 
 |  * "non-critical" part of the whole semaphore business. The | 
 |  * critical part is the inline stuff in <asm/semaphore.h> | 
 |  * where we want to avoid any extra jumps and calls. | 
 |  */ | 
 |  | 
 | /* | 
 |  * Logic: | 
 |  *  - only on a boundary condition do we need to care. When we go | 
 |  *    from a negative count to a non-negative, we wake people up. | 
 |  *  - when we go from a non-negative count to a negative do we | 
 |  *    (a) synchronize with the "sleeper" count and (b) make sure | 
 |  *    that we're on the wakeup list before we synchronize so that | 
 |  *    we cannot lose wakeup events. | 
 |  */ | 
 |  | 
 | asmlinkage void __up(struct semaphore *sem) | 
 | { | 
 | 	wake_up(&sem->wait); | 
 | } | 
 |  | 
 | asmlinkage void __sched __down(struct semaphore * sem) | 
 | { | 
 | 	struct task_struct *tsk = current; | 
 | 	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk); | 
 | 	unsigned long flags; | 
 |  | 
 | 	tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE; | 
 | 	spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags); | 
 | 	add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait); | 
 |  | 
 | 	sem->sleepers++; | 
 | 	for (;;) { | 
 | 		int sleepers = sem->sleepers; | 
 |  | 
 | 		/* | 
 | 		 * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't | 
 | 		 * playing, because we own the spinlock in | 
 | 		 * the wait_queue_head. | 
 | 		 */ | 
 | 		if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers - 1, &sem->count)) { | 
 | 			sem->sleepers = 0; | 
 | 			break; | 
 | 		} | 
 | 		sem->sleepers = 1;	/* us - see -1 above */ | 
 | 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags); | 
 |  | 
 | 		schedule(); | 
 |  | 
 | 		spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags); | 
 | 		tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE; | 
 | 	} | 
 | 	remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait); | 
 | 	wake_up_locked(&sem->wait); | 
 | 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags); | 
 | 	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING; | 
 | } | 
 |  | 
 | asmlinkage int __sched __down_interruptible(struct semaphore * sem) | 
 | { | 
 | 	int retval = 0; | 
 | 	struct task_struct *tsk = current; | 
 | 	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk); | 
 | 	unsigned long flags; | 
 |  | 
 | 	tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE; | 
 | 	spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags); | 
 | 	add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait); | 
 |  | 
 | 	sem->sleepers++; | 
 | 	for (;;) { | 
 | 		int sleepers = sem->sleepers; | 
 |  | 
 | 		/* | 
 | 		 * With signals pending, this turns into | 
 | 		 * the trylock failure case - we won't be | 
 | 		 * sleeping, and we* can't get the lock as | 
 | 		 * it has contention. Just correct the count | 
 | 		 * and exit. | 
 | 		 */ | 
 | 		if (signal_pending(current)) { | 
 | 			retval = -EINTR; | 
 | 			sem->sleepers = 0; | 
 | 			atomic_add(sleepers, &sem->count); | 
 | 			break; | 
 | 		} | 
 |  | 
 | 		/* | 
 | 		 * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't | 
 | 		 * playing, because we own the spinlock in | 
 | 		 * wait_queue_head. The "-1" is because we're | 
 | 		 * still hoping to get the semaphore. | 
 | 		 */ | 
 | 		if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers - 1, &sem->count)) { | 
 | 			sem->sleepers = 0; | 
 | 			break; | 
 | 		} | 
 | 		sem->sleepers = 1;	/* us - see -1 above */ | 
 | 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags); | 
 |  | 
 | 		schedule(); | 
 |  | 
 | 		spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags); | 
 | 		tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE; | 
 | 	} | 
 | 	remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait); | 
 | 	wake_up_locked(&sem->wait); | 
 | 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags); | 
 |  | 
 | 	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING; | 
 | 	return retval; | 
 | } | 
 |  | 
 | /* | 
 |  * Trylock failed - make sure we correct for | 
 |  * having decremented the count. | 
 |  * | 
 |  * We could have done the trylock with a | 
 |  * single "cmpxchg" without failure cases, | 
 |  * but then it wouldn't work on a 386. | 
 |  */ | 
 | asmlinkage int __down_trylock(struct semaphore * sem) | 
 | { | 
 | 	int sleepers; | 
 | 	unsigned long flags; | 
 |  | 
 | 	spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags); | 
 | 	sleepers = sem->sleepers + 1; | 
 | 	sem->sleepers = 0; | 
 |  | 
 | 	/* | 
 | 	 * Add "everybody else" and us into it. They aren't | 
 | 	 * playing, because we own the spinlock in the | 
 | 	 * wait_queue_head. | 
 | 	 */ | 
 | 	if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers, &sem->count)) { | 
 | 		wake_up_locked(&sem->wait); | 
 | 	} | 
 |  | 
 | 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags); | 
 | 	return 1; | 
 | } |