)]}'
{
  "commit": "435f8a605d3b56bb96212f4d70b62ecbd0629340",
  "tree": "fe926ea8cf121b6544f211ff1acd06e37eae682e",
  "parents": [
    "e34efe3b100d0fbdf053128956c3dd0bc68754d6"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Linus Torvalds",
    "email": "torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org",
    "time": "Fri Feb 02 08:07:42 2007 -0800"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Linus Torvalds",
    "email": "torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org",
    "time": "Fri Feb 02 08:07:42 2007 -0800"
  },
  "message": "Revert \"[PATCH] fix typo in geode_configre()@cyrix.c\"\n\nThis reverts commit e4f0ae0ea63caceff37a13f281a72652b7ea71ba.\n\nIt\u0027s not wrong, but it\u0027s not right either, and everybody seems to agree\nthat the right fix is probably to do the ccr3 write after the ccr4 one\n(and that we also should clean it up a bit).  And after that we need to\nreally validate that all the bits that we write to ccr4 actually do\nwork.\n\nThe old 2.6.19 code was insane, and basically didn\u0027t change ccr4 at all\n(even though it certainly looks like it was the *intent* to do so).  So\nlet\u0027s revert the change that may fix things, just because it\u0027s not what\nwas actually ever tested when the code was written, even if it _was_ the\nintent.\n\nThere\u0027s a discussion on http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/9/63 that was\nstarted by the patch that now gets reverted, and that discussion may\nwell contain the proper long-term fix.\n\nSuggested-by: Adrian Bunk \u003cbunk@stusta.de\u003e\nAcked-by: Andrew Morton \u003cakpm@linux-foundation.org\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Linus Torvalds \u003ctorvalds@linux-foundation.org\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "abcff92f994c06eafd9aa52f13b1401498c789fa",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cyrix.c",
      "new_id": "c0c3b59de32c4d183b677e843ffacffa5aa2f1bb",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cyrix.c"
    }
  ]
}