)]}'
{
  "commit": "455c0d71d46e86b0b7ff2c9dcfc19bc162302ee9",
  "tree": "f313e798445ff65517599b429aa8563d6f26fe71",
  "parents": [
    "f8b55f251012e104093e105483c45c5d85ad3040"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Darrick J. Wong",
    "email": "djwong@us.ibm.com",
    "time": "Thu Feb 18 10:28:20 2010 -0800"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Len Brown",
    "email": "len.brown@intel.com",
    "time": "Fri Feb 19 01:11:48 2010 -0500"
  },
  "message": "ACPI: Fix regression where _PPC is not read at boot even when ignore_ppc\u003d0\n\nEarlier, Ingo Molnar posted a patch to make it so that the kernel would avoid\nreading _PPC on his broken T60.  Unfortunately, it seems that with Thomas\nRenninger\u0027s patch last July to eliminate _PPC evaluations when the processor\ndriver loads, the kernel never actually reads _PPC at all!  This is problematic\nif you happen to boot your non-T60 computer in a state where the BIOS _wants_\n_PPC to be something other than zero.\n\nSo, put the _PPC evaluation back into acpi_processor_get_performance_info if\nignore_ppc isn\u0027t 1.\n\nSigned-off-by: Darrick J. Wong \u003cdjwong@us.ibm.com\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Len Brown \u003clen.brown@intel.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "2cabadcc4d8c36806bc886080a6c0cae3d50dd04",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c",
      "new_id": "a959f6a075083153580902746aabb8f178d425f4",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c"
    }
  ]
}