of: unify phandle name in struct device_node
In struct device_node, the phandle is named 'linux_phandle' for PowerPC
and MicroBlaze, and 'node' for SPARC. There is no good reason for the
difference, it is just an artifact of the code diverging over a couple
of years. This patch renames both to simply .phandle.
Note: the .node also existed in PowerPC/MicroBlaze, but the only user
seems to be arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/pfunc_core.c. It doesn't
look like the assignment between .linux_phandle and .node is
significantly different enough to warrant the separate code paths
unless ibm,phandle properties actually appear in Apple device trees.
I think it is safe to eliminate the old .node property and use
phandle everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/prom_common.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/prom_common.c
index d80a65d..5832e13 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/prom_common.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/prom_common.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
struct device_node *np;
for (np = allnodes; np; np = np->allnext)
- if (np->node == handle)
+ if (np->phandle == handle)
break;
return np;
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
void *old_val = prop->value;
int ret;
- ret = prom_setprop(dp->node, name, val, len);
+ ret = prom_setprop(dp->phandle, name, val, len);
err = -EINVAL;
if (ret >= 0) {
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@
dp->name = get_one_property(node, "name");
dp->type = get_one_property(node, "device_type");
- dp->node = node;
+ dp->phandle = node;
dp->properties = build_prop_list(node);
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@
nextp = &allnodes->allnext;
allnodes->child = prom_build_tree(allnodes,
- prom_getchild(allnodes->node),
+ prom_getchild(allnodes->phandle),
&nextp);
of_console_init();