Generic semaphore implementation
Semaphores are no longer performance-critical, so a generic C
implementation is better for maintainability, debuggability and
extensibility. Thanks to Peter Zijlstra for fixing the lockdep
warning. Thanks to Harvey Harrison for pointing out that the
unlikely() was unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
diff --git a/arch/m68k/lib/Makefile b/arch/m68k/lib/Makefile
index 6bbf19f..a18af09 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/lib/Makefile
+++ b/arch/m68k/lib/Makefile
@@ -5,4 +5,4 @@
EXTRA_AFLAGS := -traditional
lib-y := ashldi3.o ashrdi3.o lshrdi3.o muldi3.o \
- checksum.o string.o semaphore.o uaccess.o
+ checksum.o string.o uaccess.o
diff --git a/arch/m68k/lib/semaphore.S b/arch/m68k/lib/semaphore.S
deleted file mode 100644
index 0215624c..0000000
--- a/arch/m68k/lib/semaphore.S
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,53 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * linux/arch/m68k/lib/semaphore.S
- *
- * Copyright (C) 1996 Linus Torvalds
- *
- * m68k version by Andreas Schwab
- */
-
-#include <linux/linkage.h>
-#include <asm/semaphore.h>
-
-/*
- * The semaphore operations have a special calling sequence that
- * allow us to do a simpler in-line version of them. These routines
- * need to convert that sequence back into the C sequence when
- * there is contention on the semaphore.
- */
-ENTRY(__down_failed)
- moveml %a0/%d0/%d1,-(%sp)
- movel %a1,-(%sp)
- jbsr __down
- movel (%sp)+,%a1
- moveml (%sp)+,%a0/%d0/%d1
- rts
-
-ENTRY(__down_failed_interruptible)
- movel %a0,-(%sp)
- movel %d1,-(%sp)
- movel %a1,-(%sp)
- jbsr __down_interruptible
- movel (%sp)+,%a1
- movel (%sp)+,%d1
- movel (%sp)+,%a0
- rts
-
-ENTRY(__down_failed_trylock)
- movel %a0,-(%sp)
- movel %d1,-(%sp)
- movel %a1,-(%sp)
- jbsr __down_trylock
- movel (%sp)+,%a1
- movel (%sp)+,%d1
- movel (%sp)+,%a0
- rts
-
-ENTRY(__up_wakeup)
- moveml %a0/%d0/%d1,-(%sp)
- movel %a1,-(%sp)
- jbsr __up
- movel (%sp)+,%a1
- moveml (%sp)+,%a0/%d0/%d1
- rts
-