Generic semaphore implementation
Semaphores are no longer performance-critical, so a generic C
implementation is better for maintainability, debuggability and
extensibility. Thanks to Peter Zijlstra for fixing the lockdep
warning. Thanks to Harvey Harrison for pointing out that the
unlikely() was unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/Makefile b/arch/sparc/kernel/Makefile
index bf1b15d..2712bb1 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/Makefile
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
sys_sparc.o sunos_asm.o systbls.o \
time.o windows.o cpu.o devices.o sclow.o \
tadpole.o tick14.o ptrace.o sys_solaris.o \
- unaligned.o una_asm.o muldiv.o semaphore.o \
+ unaligned.o una_asm.o muldiv.o \
prom.o of_device.o devres.o
devres-y = ../../../kernel/irq/devres.o