)]}'
{
  "commit": "69ecbbedac8e353bbd924fad16fed0c7c54e6382",
  "tree": "f008c3ad0750585ea3d403718251922f215cb626",
  "parents": [
    "0fdf86754f70e813845af4abaa805165ce57a0bb"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Dan Carpenter",
    "email": "error27@gmail.com",
    "time": "Mon Mar 15 11:21:13 2010 +0300"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Jan Kara",
    "email": "jack@suse.cz",
    "time": "Thu Apr 08 15:35:20 2010 +0200"
  },
  "message": "udf: potential integer overflow\n\nbloc-\u003elogicalBlockNum is unsigned so it\u0027s never less than zero.\n\nWhen I saw that, it made me worry that \"bloc-\u003elogicalBlockNum + count\"\ncould overflow.  That\u0027s why I changed the check for less than zero\nto an overflow check.  (The test works because \"count\" is also\nunsigned.)\n\nSigned-off-by: Dan Carpenter \u003cerror27@gmail.com\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Jan Kara \u003cjack@suse.cz\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "19626e2491c4656b56fe672d3a9f3f8a09143c66",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "fs/udf/balloc.c",
      "new_id": "9a9378b4eb5ae2c89495b9025d7be8c5aa04ef5b",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "fs/udf/balloc.c"
    }
  ]
}