)]}'
{
  "commit": "9a4b430451bb6d8d6b7dcdfbee0e1330b7c475a6",
  "tree": "aa9a075b658a5045779e6d2463715126263f21dc",
  "parents": [
    "761b3ef50e1c2649cffbfa67a4dcb2dcdb7982ed"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Frederic Weisbecker",
    "email": "fweisbec@gmail.com",
    "time": "Wed Feb 08 03:37:26 2012 +0100"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Tejun Heo",
    "email": "tj@kernel.org",
    "time": "Tue Feb 21 09:46:43 2012 -0800"
  },
  "message": "cgroup: Remove wrong comment on cgroup_enable_task_cg_list()\n\nRemove the stale comment about RCU protection. Many callers\n(all of them?) of cgroup_enable_task_cg_list() don\u0027t seem\nto be in an RCU read side critical section. Besides, RCU is\nnot helpful to protect against while_each_thread().\n\nSigned-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker \u003cfweisbec@gmail.com\u003e\nAcked-by: Li Zefan \u003clizf@cn.fujitsu.com\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Tejun Heo \u003ctj@kernel.org\u003e\nCc: Mandeep Singh Baines \u003cmsb@chromium.org\u003e\nCc: Oleg Nesterov \u003coleg@redhat.com\u003e\nCc: Andrew Morton \u003cakpm@linux-foundation.org\u003e\nCc: Paul E. McKenney \u003cpaulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "865d89a580c767819391b1afe096fc5ebc6718c1",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "kernel/cgroup.c",
      "new_id": "6e4eb431257196a4dcc75cfd3079142fb41ecbc1",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "kernel/cgroup.c"
    }
  ]
}