)]}'
{
  "commit": "b69874e4f530b0103e507f695c010d00cb85a4df",
  "tree": "fbb34a24796eab26046ea54138ef14a244d920bc",
  "parents": [
    "111b20d01346b9635b3223c7af4e40e43bee8dc6"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Russell King",
    "email": "rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk",
    "time": "Tue Jun 21 18:57:31 2011 +0100"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Russell King",
    "email": "rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk",
    "time": "Fri Jun 24 08:47:12 2011 +0100"
  },
  "message": "ARM: pm: arrange for cpu_proc_init() to be called on resume\n\ncpu_proc_init() does processor specific initialization, which we do\nat boot time.  We have been omitting to do this on resume, which\ncauses some of this initialization to be skipped.  We\u0027ve also been\nskipping this on SMP initialization too.\n\nEnsure that cpu_proc_init() is always called appropriately by\nmoving it into cpu_init(), and move cpu_init() to a more appropriate\npoint in the boot initialization.\n\nTested-by: Kevin Hilman \u003ckhilman@ti.com\u003e\nAcked-by: Jean Pihet \u003cj-pihet@ti.com\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Russell King \u003crmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "ed11fb08b05a5b2d3fd022d981970c01c9fdc088",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "arch/arm/kernel/setup.c",
      "new_id": "edcab02be64c14e8333776060332f60d8d5726c6",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "arch/arm/kernel/setup.c"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "184a9c997e36616dcc6819418d380f9d9e439291",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "arch/arm/mm/proc-sa1100.S",
      "new_id": "e9c47271732ddcc3687e31b7c1c7b2795d35c95a",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "arch/arm/mm/proc-sa1100.S"
    }
  ]
}