)]}'
{
  "commit": "f549da848eca595abca14ebc5e1bf00fd72aa53d",
  "tree": "25069c378b06c23f9f12a9e08c8f670d899f188b",
  "parents": [
    "f8700df7c419781efb34696de7e7f49717f8ede7"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Suresh Siddha",
    "email": "suresh.b.siddha@intel.com",
    "time": "Thu Aug 23 15:18:02 2007 +0200"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Ingo Molnar",
    "email": "mingo@elte.hu",
    "time": "Thu Aug 23 15:18:02 2007 +0200"
  },
  "message": "sched: skip updating rq\u0027s next_balance under null SD\n\nWas playing with sched_smt_power_savings/sched_mc_power_savings and\nfound out that while the scheduler domains are reconstructed when sysfs\nsettings change, rebalance_domains() can get triggered with null domain\non other cpus, which is setting next_balance to jiffies + 60*HZ.\nResulting in no idle/busy balancing for 60 seconds.\n\nFix this.\n\nSigned-off-by: Suresh Siddha \u003csuresh.b.siddha@intel.com\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Ingo Molnar \u003cmingo@elte.hu\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "d96030db8ff7b21e4cc592b7dafeef1af8a98cd4",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "kernel/sched.c",
      "new_id": "a4b22d93e00d653e7f55c5b9c4664e0721e051ad",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "kernel/sched.c"
    }
  ]
}
