get rid of propagate_umount() mistakenly treating slaves as busy.
commit 88b368f27a094277143d8ecd5a056116f6a41520 upstream.
The check in __propagate_umount() ("has somebody explicitly mounted
something on that slave?") is done *before* taking the already doomed
victims out of the child lists.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
[lizf: Backported to 3.4:
- adjust context
- s/hlist_for_each_entry/list_for_each_entry/]
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
index 4e46539..2985879 100644
--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -1066,6 +1066,9 @@
for (p = mnt; p; p = next_mnt(p, mnt))
list_move(&p->mnt_hash, &tmp_list);
+ list_for_each_entry(p, &tmp_list, mnt_hash)
+ list_del_init(&p->mnt_child);
+
if (propagate)
propagate_umount(&tmp_list);
@@ -1076,7 +1079,6 @@
if (p->mnt_ns)
__mnt_make_shortterm(p);
p->mnt_ns = NULL;
- list_del_init(&p->mnt_child);
if (mnt_has_parent(p)) {
p->mnt_parent->mnt_ghosts++;
dentry_reset_mounted(p->mnt_mountpoint);