)]}'
{
  "commit": "fcc8abc8d4fcdbddc383091449f3696b411aa8fb",
  "tree": "281f7d7af595153904ed3458329f3c868f4e092d",
  "parents": [
    "8872187780f6104216c67e7b60c11f708b513c38"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "David Teigland",
    "email": "teigland@redhat.com",
    "time": "Thu Aug 10 13:31:23 2006 -0500"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Steven Whitehouse",
    "email": "swhiteho@redhat.com",
    "time": "Fri Aug 11 09:44:00 2006 -0400"
  },
  "message": "[DLM] move kmap to after spin_unlock\n\nDoing the kmap() while holding the spinlock was causing recursive spinlock\nproblems.  It seems the kmap was scheduling, although there was no warning\nas I\u0027d expect.  Patrick, do we need locking around the kmap?\n\nSigned-off-by: David Teigland \u003cteigland@redhat.com\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Steven Whitehouse \u003cswhiteho@redhat.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "7ab40422ab578138b1509e5e1729cd40dab5f9d7",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "fs/dlm/lowcomms.c",
      "new_id": "23f5ce12080b0e2f0d48b03ff844c78c5932113a",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "fs/dlm/lowcomms.c"
    }
  ]
}