| Steven Rostedt | a6537be | 2006-06-27 02:54:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | RT-mutex subsystem with PI support | 
|  | 2 | ---------------------------------- | 
|  | 3 |  | 
|  | 4 | RT-mutexes with priority inheritance are used to support PI-futexes, | 
|  | 5 | which enable pthread_mutex_t priority inheritance attributes | 
|  | 6 | (PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT). [See Documentation/pi-futex.txt for more details | 
|  | 7 | about PI-futexes.] | 
|  | 8 |  | 
|  | 9 | This technology was developed in the -rt tree and streamlined for | 
|  | 10 | pthread_mutex support. | 
|  | 11 |  | 
|  | 12 | Basic principles: | 
|  | 13 | ----------------- | 
|  | 14 |  | 
|  | 15 | RT-mutexes extend the semantics of simple mutexes by the priority | 
|  | 16 | inheritance protocol. | 
|  | 17 |  | 
|  | 18 | A low priority owner of a rt-mutex inherits the priority of a higher | 
|  | 19 | priority waiter until the rt-mutex is released. If the temporarily | 
|  | 20 | boosted owner blocks on a rt-mutex itself it propagates the priority | 
|  | 21 | boosting to the owner of the other rt_mutex it gets blocked on. The | 
|  | 22 | priority boosting is immediately removed once the rt_mutex has been | 
|  | 23 | unlocked. | 
|  | 24 |  | 
|  | 25 | This approach allows us to shorten the block of high-prio tasks on | 
|  | 26 | mutexes which protect shared resources. Priority inheritance is not a | 
|  | 27 | magic bullet for poorly designed applications, but it allows | 
|  | 28 | well-designed applications to use userspace locks in critical parts of | 
|  | 29 | an high priority thread, without losing determinism. | 
|  | 30 |  | 
|  | 31 | The enqueueing of the waiters into the rtmutex waiter list is done in | 
|  | 32 | priority order. For same priorities FIFO order is chosen. For each | 
|  | 33 | rtmutex, only the top priority waiter is enqueued into the owner's | 
|  | 34 | priority waiters list. This list too queues in priority order. Whenever | 
|  | 35 | the top priority waiter of a task changes (for example it timed out or | 
|  | 36 | got a signal), the priority of the owner task is readjusted. [The | 
|  | 37 | priority enqueueing is handled by "plists", see include/linux/plist.h | 
|  | 38 | for more details.] | 
|  | 39 |  | 
|  | 40 | RT-mutexes are optimized for fastpath operations and have no internal | 
|  | 41 | locking overhead when locking an uncontended mutex or unlocking a mutex | 
|  | 42 | without waiters. The optimized fastpath operations require cmpxchg | 
|  | 43 | support. [If that is not available then the rt-mutex internal spinlock | 
|  | 44 | is used] | 
|  | 45 |  | 
|  | 46 | The state of the rt-mutex is tracked via the owner field of the rt-mutex | 
|  | 47 | structure: | 
|  | 48 |  | 
|  | 49 | rt_mutex->owner holds the task_struct pointer of the owner. Bit 0 and 1 | 
|  | 50 | are used to keep track of the "owner is pending" and "rtmutex has | 
|  | 51 | waiters" state. | 
|  | 52 |  | 
|  | 53 | owner		bit1	bit0 | 
|  | 54 | NULL		0	0	mutex is free (fast acquire possible) | 
|  | 55 | NULL		0	1	invalid state | 
|  | 56 | NULL		1	0	Transitional state* | 
|  | 57 | NULL		1	1	invalid state | 
|  | 58 | taskpointer	0	0	mutex is held (fast release possible) | 
|  | 59 | taskpointer	0	1	task is pending owner | 
|  | 60 | taskpointer	1	0	mutex is held and has waiters | 
|  | 61 | taskpointer	1	1	task is pending owner and mutex has waiters | 
|  | 62 |  | 
|  | 63 | Pending-ownership handling is a performance optimization: | 
|  | 64 | pending-ownership is assigned to the first (highest priority) waiter of | 
|  | 65 | the mutex, when the mutex is released. The thread is woken up and once | 
|  | 66 | it starts executing it can acquire the mutex. Until the mutex is taken | 
|  | 67 | by it (bit 0 is cleared) a competing higher priority thread can "steal" | 
|  | 68 | the mutex which puts the woken up thread back on the waiters list. | 
|  | 69 |  | 
|  | 70 | The pending-ownership optimization is especially important for the | 
|  | 71 | uninterrupted workflow of high-prio tasks which repeatedly | 
|  | 72 | takes/releases locks that have lower-prio waiters. Without this | 
|  | 73 | optimization the higher-prio thread would ping-pong to the lower-prio | 
|  | 74 | task [because at unlock time we always assign a new owner]. | 
|  | 75 |  | 
|  | 76 | (*) The "mutex has waiters" bit gets set to take the lock. If the lock | 
|  | 77 | doesn't already have an owner, this bit is quickly cleared if there are | 
|  | 78 | no waiters.  So this is a transitional state to synchronize with looking | 
|  | 79 | at the owner field of the mutex and the mutex owner releasing the lock. |