| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | CONFIG_RCU_TRACE debugfs Files and Formats | 
 | 2 |  | 
 | 3 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 4 | The rcutree implementation of RCU provides debugfs trace output that | 
 | 5 | summarizes counters and state.  This information is useful for debugging | 
 | 6 | RCU itself, and can sometimes also help to debug abuses of RCU. | 
 | 7 | The following sections describe the debugfs files and formats. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 8 |  | 
 | 9 |  | 
 | 10 | Hierarchical RCU debugfs Files and Formats | 
 | 11 |  | 
 | 12 | This implementation of RCU provides three debugfs files under the | 
 | 13 | top-level directory RCU: rcu/rcudata (which displays fields in struct | 
 | 14 | rcu_data), rcu/rcugp (which displays grace-period counters), and | 
 | 15 | rcu/rcuhier (which displays the struct rcu_node hierarchy). | 
 | 16 |  | 
 | 17 | The output of "cat rcu/rcudata" looks as follows: | 
 | 18 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | d6714c2 | 2009-08-22 13:56:46 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 19 | rcu_sched: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 20 |   0 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=10951/1 dn=0 df=1101 of=0 ri=36 ql=0 b=10 | 
 | 21 |   1 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=16117/1 dn=0 df=1015 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
 | 22 |   2 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=1445/1 dn=0 df=1839 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
 | 23 |   3 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=6681/1 dn=0 df=1545 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
 | 24 |   4 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=1003/1 dn=0 df=1992 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
 | 25 |   5 c=17829 g=17830 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=1 dt=3887/1 dn=0 df=3331 of=0 ri=4 ql=2 b=10 | 
 | 26 |   6 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=859/1 dn=0 df=3224 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
 | 27 |   7 c=17829 g=17830 pq=0 pqc=17829 qp=1 dt=3761/1 dn=0 df=1818 of=0 ri=0 ql=2 b=10 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 28 | rcu_bh: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 29 |   0 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=10951/1 dn=0 df=0 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
 | 30 |   1 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=16117/1 dn=0 df=13 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
 | 31 |   2 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=1445/1 dn=0 df=15 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
 | 32 |   3 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=6681/1 dn=0 df=9 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
 | 33 |   4 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=1003/1 dn=0 df=15 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
 | 34 |   5 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=3887/1 dn=0 df=15 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
 | 35 |   6 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=859/1 dn=0 df=15 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
 | 36 |   7 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=3761/1 dn=0 df=15 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 37 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 38 | The first section lists the rcu_data structures for rcu_sched, the second | 
 | 39 | for rcu_bh.  Note that CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels will have an | 
 | 40 | additional section for rcu_preempt.  Each section has one line per CPU, | 
 | 41 | or eight for this 8-CPU system.  The fields are as follows: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 42 |  | 
 | 43 | o	The number at the beginning of each line is the CPU number. | 
 | 44 | 	CPUs numbers followed by an exclamation mark are offline, | 
 | 45 | 	but have been online at least once since boot.	There will be | 
 | 46 | 	no output for CPUs that have never been online, which can be | 
 | 47 | 	a good thing in the surprisingly common case where NR_CPUS is | 
 | 48 | 	substantially larger than the number of actual CPUs. | 
 | 49 |  | 
 | 50 | o	"c" is the count of grace periods that this CPU believes have | 
 | 51 | 	completed.  CPUs in dynticks idle mode may lag quite a ways | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 52 | 	behind, for example, CPU 4 under "rcu_sched" above, which has | 
 | 53 | 	slept through the past 25 RCU grace periods.  It is not unusual | 
 | 54 | 	to see CPUs lagging by thousands of grace periods. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 55 |  | 
 | 56 | o	"g" is the count of grace periods that this CPU believes have | 
 | 57 | 	started.  Again, CPUs in dynticks idle mode may lag behind. | 
 | 58 | 	If the "c" and "g" values are equal, this CPU has already | 
 | 59 | 	reported a quiescent state for the last RCU grace period that | 
 | 60 | 	it is aware of, otherwise, the CPU believes that it owes RCU a | 
 | 61 | 	quiescent state. | 
 | 62 |  | 
 | 63 | o	"pq" indicates that this CPU has passed through a quiescent state | 
 | 64 | 	for the current grace period.  It is possible for "pq" to be | 
 | 65 | 	"1" and "c" different than "g", which indicates that although | 
 | 66 | 	the CPU has passed through a quiescent state, either (1) this | 
 | 67 | 	CPU has not yet reported that fact, (2) some other CPU has not | 
 | 68 | 	yet reported for this grace period, or (3) both. | 
 | 69 |  | 
 | 70 | o	"pqc" indicates which grace period the last-observed quiescent | 
 | 71 | 	state for this CPU corresponds to.  This is important for handling | 
 | 72 | 	the race between CPU 0 reporting an extended dynticks-idle | 
 | 73 | 	quiescent state for CPU 1 and CPU 1 suddenly waking up and | 
 | 74 | 	reporting its own quiescent state.  If CPU 1 was the last CPU | 
 | 75 | 	for the current grace period, then the CPU that loses this race | 
 | 76 | 	will attempt to incorrectly mark CPU 1 as having checked in for | 
 | 77 | 	the next grace period! | 
 | 78 |  | 
 | 79 | o	"qp" indicates that RCU still expects a quiescent state from | 
 | 80 | 	this CPU. | 
 | 81 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 82 | o	"dt" is the current value of the dyntick counter that is incremented | 
 | 83 | 	when entering or leaving dynticks idle state, either by the | 
 | 84 | 	scheduler or by irq.  The number after the "/" is the interrupt | 
 | 85 | 	nesting depth when in dyntick-idle state, or one greater than | 
 | 86 | 	the interrupt-nesting depth otherwise. | 
 | 87 |  | 
 | 88 | 	This field is displayed only for CONFIG_NO_HZ kernels. | 
 | 89 |  | 
 | 90 | o	"dn" is the current value of the dyntick counter that is incremented | 
 | 91 | 	when entering or leaving dynticks idle state via NMI.  If both | 
 | 92 | 	the "dt" and "dn" values are even, then this CPU is in dynticks | 
 | 93 | 	idle mode and may be ignored by RCU.  If either of these two | 
 | 94 | 	counters is odd, then RCU must be alert to the possibility of | 
 | 95 | 	an RCU read-side critical section running on this CPU. | 
 | 96 |  | 
 | 97 | 	This field is displayed only for CONFIG_NO_HZ kernels. | 
 | 98 |  | 
 | 99 | o	"df" is the number of times that some other CPU has forced a | 
 | 100 | 	quiescent state on behalf of this CPU due to this CPU being in | 
 | 101 | 	dynticks-idle state. | 
 | 102 |  | 
 | 103 | 	This field is displayed only for CONFIG_NO_HZ kernels. | 
 | 104 |  | 
 | 105 | o	"of" is the number of times that some other CPU has forced a | 
 | 106 | 	quiescent state on behalf of this CPU due to this CPU being | 
 | 107 | 	offline.  In a perfect world, this might neve happen, but it | 
 | 108 | 	turns out that offlining and onlining a CPU can take several grace | 
 | 109 | 	periods, and so there is likely to be an extended period of time | 
 | 110 | 	when RCU believes that the CPU is online when it really is not. | 
 | 111 | 	Please note that erring in the other direction (RCU believing a | 
 | 112 | 	CPU is offline when it is really alive and kicking) is a fatal | 
 | 113 | 	error, so it makes sense to err conservatively. | 
 | 114 |  | 
 | 115 | o	"ri" is the number of times that RCU has seen fit to send a | 
 | 116 | 	reschedule IPI to this CPU in order to get it to report a | 
 | 117 | 	quiescent state. | 
 | 118 |  | 
 | 119 | o	"ql" is the number of RCU callbacks currently residing on | 
 | 120 | 	this CPU.  This is the total number of callbacks, regardless | 
 | 121 | 	of what state they are in (new, waiting for grace period to | 
 | 122 | 	start, waiting for grace period to end, ready to invoke). | 
 | 123 |  | 
 | 124 | o	"b" is the batch limit for this CPU.  If more than this number | 
 | 125 | 	of RCU callbacks is ready to invoke, then the remainder will | 
 | 126 | 	be deferred. | 
 | 127 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 269dcc1 | 2010-09-07 14:23:09 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 128 | o	"ci" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been invoked for | 
 | 129 | 	this CPU.  Note that ci+ql is the number of callbacks that have | 
 | 130 | 	been registered in absence of CPU-hotplug activity. | 
 | 131 |  | 
 | 132 | o	"co" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been orphaned due to | 
 | 133 | 	this CPU going offline. | 
 | 134 |  | 
 | 135 | o	"ca" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been adopted due to | 
 | 136 | 	other CPUs going offline.  Note that ci+co-ca+ql is the number of | 
 | 137 | 	RCU callbacks registered on this CPU. | 
 | 138 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 139 | There is also an rcu/rcudata.csv file with the same information in | 
 | 140 | comma-separated-variable spreadsheet format. | 
 | 141 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 142 |  | 
 | 143 | The output of "cat rcu/rcugp" looks as follows: | 
 | 144 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | d6714c2 | 2009-08-22 13:56:46 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 145 | rcu_sched: completed=33062  gpnum=33063 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 146 | rcu_bh: completed=464  gpnum=464 | 
 | 147 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 148 | Again, this output is for both "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh".  Note that | 
 | 149 | kernels built with CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU will have an additional | 
 | 150 | "rcu_preempt" line.  The fields are taken from the rcu_state structure, | 
 | 151 | and are as follows: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 152 |  | 
 | 153 | o	"completed" is the number of grace periods that have completed. | 
 | 154 | 	It is comparable to the "c" field from rcu/rcudata in that a | 
 | 155 | 	CPU whose "c" field matches the value of "completed" is aware | 
 | 156 | 	that the corresponding RCU grace period has completed. | 
 | 157 |  | 
 | 158 | o	"gpnum" is the number of grace periods that have started.  It is | 
 | 159 | 	comparable to the "g" field from rcu/rcudata in that a CPU | 
 | 160 | 	whose "g" field matches the value of "gpnum" is aware that the | 
 | 161 | 	corresponding RCU grace period has started. | 
 | 162 |  | 
 | 163 | 	If these two fields are equal (as they are for "rcu_bh" above), | 
 | 164 | 	then there is no grace period in progress, in other words, RCU | 
 | 165 | 	is idle.  On the other hand, if the two fields differ (as they | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 166 | 	do for "rcu_sched" above), then an RCU grace period is in progress. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 167 |  | 
 | 168 |  | 
 | 169 | The output of "cat rcu/rcuhier" looks as follows, with very long lines: | 
 | 170 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 171 | c=6902 g=6903 s=2 jfq=3 j=72c7 nfqs=13142/nfqsng=0(13142) fqlh=6 oqlen=0 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 0edf1a6 | 2009-10-14 10:15:59 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 172 | 1/1 .>. 0:127 ^0     | 
 | 173 | 3/3 .>. 0:35 ^0    0/0 .>. 36:71 ^1    0/0 .>. 72:107 ^2    0/0 .>. 108:127 ^3     | 
 | 174 | 3/3f .>. 0:5 ^0    2/3 .>. 6:11 ^1    0/0 .>. 12:17 ^2    0/0 .>. 18:23 ^3    0/0 .>. 24:29 ^4    0/0 .>. 30:35 ^5    0/0 .>. 36:41 ^0    0/0 .>. 42:47 ^1    0/0 .>. 48:53 ^2    0/0 .>. 54:59 ^3    0/0 .>. 60:65 ^4    0/0 .>. 66:71 ^5    0/0 .>. 72:77 ^0    0/0 .>. 78:83 ^1    0/0 .>. 84:89 ^2    0/0 .>. 90:95 ^3    0/0 .>. 96:101 ^4    0/0 .>. 102:107 ^5    0/0 .>. 108:113 ^0    0/0 .>. 114:119 ^1    0/0 .>. 120:125 ^2    0/0 .>. 126:127 ^3     | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 175 | rcu_bh: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 176 | c=-226 g=-226 s=1 jfq=-5701 j=72c7 nfqs=88/nfqsng=0(88) fqlh=0 oqlen=0 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 0edf1a6 | 2009-10-14 10:15:59 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 177 | 0/1 .>. 0:127 ^0     | 
 | 178 | 0/3 .>. 0:35 ^0    0/0 .>. 36:71 ^1    0/0 .>. 72:107 ^2    0/0 .>. 108:127 ^3     | 
 | 179 | 0/3f .>. 0:5 ^0    0/3 .>. 6:11 ^1    0/0 .>. 12:17 ^2    0/0 .>. 18:23 ^3    0/0 .>. 24:29 ^4    0/0 .>. 30:35 ^5    0/0 .>. 36:41 ^0    0/0 .>. 42:47 ^1    0/0 .>. 48:53 ^2    0/0 .>. 54:59 ^3    0/0 .>. 60:65 ^4    0/0 .>. 66:71 ^5    0/0 .>. 72:77 ^0    0/0 .>. 78:83 ^1    0/0 .>. 84:89 ^2    0/0 .>. 90:95 ^3    0/0 .>. 96:101 ^4    0/0 .>. 102:107 ^5    0/0 .>. 108:113 ^0    0/0 .>. 114:119 ^1    0/0 .>. 120:125 ^2    0/0 .>. 126:127 ^3 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 180 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 181 | This is once again split into "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh" portions, | 
 | 182 | and CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels will again have an additional | 
 | 183 | "rcu_preempt" section.  The fields are as follows: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 184 |  | 
 | 185 | o	"c" is exactly the same as "completed" under rcu/rcugp. | 
 | 186 |  | 
 | 187 | o	"g" is exactly the same as "gpnum" under rcu/rcugp. | 
 | 188 |  | 
 | 189 | o	"s" is the "signaled" state that drives force_quiescent_state()'s | 
 | 190 | 	state machine. | 
 | 191 |  | 
 | 192 | o	"jfq" is the number of jiffies remaining for this grace period | 
 | 193 | 	before force_quiescent_state() is invoked to help push things | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 269dcc1 | 2010-09-07 14:23:09 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 194 | 	along.  Note that CPUs in dyntick-idle mode throughout the grace | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 195 | 	period will not report on their own, but rather must be check by | 
 | 196 | 	some other CPU via force_quiescent_state(). | 
 | 197 |  | 
 | 198 | o	"j" is the low-order four hex digits of the jiffies counter. | 
 | 199 | 	Yes, Paul did run into a number of problems that turned out to | 
 | 200 | 	be due to the jiffies counter no longer counting.  Why do you ask? | 
 | 201 |  | 
 | 202 | o	"nfqs" is the number of calls to force_quiescent_state() since | 
 | 203 | 	boot. | 
 | 204 |  | 
 | 205 | o	"nfqsng" is the number of useless calls to force_quiescent_state(), | 
 | 206 | 	where there wasn't actually a grace period active.  This can | 
 | 207 | 	happen due to races.  The number in parentheses is the difference | 
 | 208 | 	between "nfqs" and "nfqsng", or the number of times that | 
 | 209 | 	force_quiescent_state() actually did some real work. | 
 | 210 |  | 
 | 211 | o	"fqlh" is the number of calls to force_quiescent_state() that | 
 | 212 | 	exited immediately (without even being counted in nfqs above) | 
 | 213 | 	due to contention on ->fqslock. | 
 | 214 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 215 | o	"oqlen" is the number of callbacks on the "orphan" callback | 
 | 216 | 	list.  RCU callbacks are placed on this list by CPUs going | 
 | 217 | 	offline, and are "adopted" either by the CPU helping the outgoing | 
 | 218 | 	CPU or by the next rcu_barrier*() call, whichever comes first. | 
 | 219 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 220 | o	Each element of the form "1/1 0:127 ^0" represents one struct | 
 | 221 | 	rcu_node.  Each line represents one level of the hierarchy, from | 
 | 222 | 	root to leaves.  It is best to think of the rcu_data structures | 
 | 223 | 	as forming yet another level after the leaves.  Note that there | 
 | 224 | 	might be either one, two, or three levels of rcu_node structures, | 
 | 225 | 	depending on the relationship between CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT and | 
 | 226 | 	CONFIG_NR_CPUS. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 0edf1a6 | 2009-10-14 10:15:59 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 227 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 228 | 	o	The numbers separated by the "/" are the qsmask followed | 
 | 229 | 		by the qsmaskinit.  The qsmask will have one bit | 
 | 230 | 		set for each entity in the next lower level that | 
 | 231 | 		has not yet checked in for the current grace period. | 
 | 232 | 		The qsmaskinit will have one bit for each entity that is | 
 | 233 | 		currently expected to check in during each grace period. | 
 | 234 | 		The value of qsmaskinit is assigned to that of qsmask | 
 | 235 | 		at the beginning of each grace period. | 
 | 236 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 237 | 		For example, for "rcu_sched", the qsmask of the first | 
 | 238 | 		entry of the lowest level is 0x14, meaning that we | 
 | 239 | 		are still waiting for CPUs 2 and 4 to check in for the | 
 | 240 | 		current grace period. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 241 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 0edf1a6 | 2009-10-14 10:15:59 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 242 | 	o	The characters separated by the ">" indicate the state | 
 | 243 | 		of the blocked-tasks lists.  A "T" preceding the ">" | 
 | 244 | 		indicates that at least one task blocked in an RCU | 
 | 245 | 		read-side critical section blocks the current grace | 
 | 246 | 		period, while a "." preceding the ">" indicates otherwise. | 
 | 247 | 		The character following the ">" indicates similarly for | 
 | 248 | 		the next grace period.  A "T" should appear in this | 
 | 249 | 		field only for rcu-preempt. | 
 | 250 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 64db4cf | 2008-12-18 21:55:32 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 251 | 	o	The numbers separated by the ":" are the range of CPUs | 
 | 252 | 		served by this struct rcu_node.  This can be helpful | 
 | 253 | 		in working out how the hierarchy is wired together. | 
 | 254 |  | 
 | 255 | 		For example, the first entry at the lowest level shows | 
 | 256 | 		"0:5", indicating that it covers CPUs 0 through 5. | 
 | 257 |  | 
 | 258 | 	o	The number after the "^" indicates the bit in the | 
 | 259 | 		next higher level rcu_node structure that this | 
 | 260 | 		rcu_node structure corresponds to. | 
 | 261 |  | 
 | 262 | 		For example, the first entry at the lowest level shows | 
 | 263 | 		"^0", indicating that it corresponds to bit zero in | 
 | 264 | 		the first entry at the middle level. | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 265 |  | 
 | 266 |  | 
 | 267 | The output of "cat rcu/rcu_pending" looks as follows: | 
 | 268 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | d6714c2 | 2009-08-22 13:56:46 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 269 | rcu_sched: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | d21670a | 2010-04-14 17:39:26 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 270 |   0 np=255892 qsp=53936 rpq=85 cbr=0 cng=14417 gpc=10033 gps=24320 nf=6445 nn=146741 | 
 | 271 |   1 np=261224 qsp=54638 rpq=33 cbr=0 cng=25723 gpc=16310 gps=2849 nf=5912 nn=155792 | 
 | 272 |   2 np=237496 qsp=49664 rpq=23 cbr=0 cng=2762 gpc=45478 gps=1762 nf=1201 nn=136629 | 
 | 273 |   3 np=236249 qsp=48766 rpq=98 cbr=0 cng=286 gpc=48049 gps=1218 nf=207 nn=137723 | 
 | 274 |   4 np=221310 qsp=46850 rpq=7 cbr=0 cng=26 gpc=43161 gps=4634 nf=3529 nn=123110 | 
 | 275 |   5 np=237332 qsp=48449 rpq=9 cbr=0 cng=54 gpc=47920 gps=3252 nf=201 nn=137456 | 
 | 276 |   6 np=219995 qsp=46718 rpq=12 cbr=0 cng=50 gpc=42098 gps=6093 nf=4202 nn=120834 | 
 | 277 |   7 np=249893 qsp=49390 rpq=42 cbr=0 cng=72 gpc=38400 gps=17102 nf=41 nn=144888 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 278 | rcu_bh: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | d21670a | 2010-04-14 17:39:26 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 279 |   0 np=146741 qsp=1419 rpq=6 cbr=0 cng=6 gpc=0 gps=0 nf=2 nn=145314 | 
 | 280 |   1 np=155792 qsp=12597 rpq=3 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=4 gps=8 nf=3 nn=143180 | 
 | 281 |   2 np=136629 qsp=18680 rpq=1 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=7 gps=6 nf=0 nn=117936 | 
 | 282 |   3 np=137723 qsp=2843 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=10 gps=7 nf=0 nn=134863 | 
 | 283 |   4 np=123110 qsp=12433 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=4 gps=2 nf=0 nn=110671 | 
 | 284 |   5 np=137456 qsp=4210 rpq=1 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=5 nf=0 nn=133235 | 
 | 285 |   6 np=120834 qsp=9902 rpq=2 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=3 nf=2 nn=110921 | 
 | 286 |   7 np=144888 qsp=26336 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=8 gps=2 nf=0 nn=118542 | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 287 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | bd58b43 | 2009-10-14 10:15:54 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 288 | As always, this is once again split into "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh" | 
 | 289 | portions, with CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels having an additional | 
 | 290 | "rcu_preempt" section.  The fields are as follows: | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 291 |  | 
 | 292 | o	"np" is the number of times that __rcu_pending() has been invoked | 
 | 293 | 	for the corresponding flavor of RCU. | 
 | 294 |  | 
 | 295 | o	"qsp" is the number of times that the RCU was waiting for a | 
 | 296 | 	quiescent state from this CPU. | 
 | 297 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | d21670a | 2010-04-14 17:39:26 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 298 | o	"rpq" is the number of times that the CPU had passed through | 
 | 299 | 	a quiescent state, but not yet reported it to RCU. | 
 | 300 |  | 
| Paul E. McKenney | 6fd9b3a | 2009-04-13 21:31:18 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 301 | o	"cbr" is the number of times that this CPU had RCU callbacks | 
 | 302 | 	that had passed through a grace period, and were thus ready | 
 | 303 | 	to be invoked. | 
 | 304 |  | 
 | 305 | o	"cng" is the number of times that this CPU needed another | 
 | 306 | 	grace period while RCU was idle. | 
 | 307 |  | 
 | 308 | o	"gpc" is the number of times that an old grace period had | 
 | 309 | 	completed, but this CPU was not yet aware of it. | 
 | 310 |  | 
 | 311 | o	"gps" is the number of times that a new grace period had started, | 
 | 312 | 	but this CPU was not yet aware of it. | 
 | 313 |  | 
 | 314 | o	"nf" is the number of times that this CPU suspected that the | 
 | 315 | 	current grace period had run for too long, and thus needed to | 
 | 316 | 	be forced. | 
 | 317 |  | 
 | 318 | 	Please note that "forcing" consists of sending resched IPIs | 
 | 319 | 	to holdout CPUs.  If that CPU really still is in an old RCU | 
 | 320 | 	read-side critical section, then we really do have to wait for it. | 
 | 321 | 	The assumption behing "forcing" is that the CPU is not still in | 
 | 322 | 	an old RCU read-side critical section, but has not yet responded | 
 | 323 | 	for some other reason. | 
 | 324 |  | 
 | 325 | o	"nn" is the number of times that this CPU needed nothing.  Alert | 
 | 326 | 	readers will note that the rcu "nn" number for a given CPU very | 
 | 327 | 	closely matches the rcu_bh "np" number for that same CPU.  This | 
 | 328 | 	is due to short-circuit evaluation in rcu_pending(). |