| Peter Zijlstra | e26af0e | 2009-09-11 12:31:23 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | /* | 
| Ingo Molnar | 51e0304 | 2009-09-16 08:54:45 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 2 | * Only give sleepers 50% of their service deficit. This allows | 
|  | 3 | * them to run sooner, but does not allow tons of sleepers to | 
|  | 4 | * rip the spread apart. | 
|  | 5 | */ | 
|  | 6 | SCHED_FEAT(GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS, 1) | 
| Peter Zijlstra | e26af0e | 2009-09-11 12:31:23 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 7 |  | 
|  | 8 | /* | 
| Peter Zijlstra | e26af0e | 2009-09-11 12:31:23 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 9 | * Place new tasks ahead so that they do not starve already running | 
|  | 10 | * tasks | 
|  | 11 | */ | 
| Peter Zijlstra | f00b45c | 2008-04-19 19:45:00 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 12 | SCHED_FEAT(START_DEBIT, 1) | 
| Peter Zijlstra | e26af0e | 2009-09-11 12:31:23 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 13 |  | 
|  | 14 | /* | 
|  | 15 | * Should wakeups try to preempt running tasks. | 
|  | 16 | */ | 
|  | 17 | SCHED_FEAT(WAKEUP_PREEMPT, 1) | 
|  | 18 |  | 
|  | 19 | /* | 
| Peter Zijlstra | e26af0e | 2009-09-11 12:31:23 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 20 | * Based on load and program behaviour, see if it makes sense to place | 
|  | 21 | * a newly woken task on the same cpu as the task that woke it -- | 
|  | 22 | * improve cache locality. Typically used with SYNC wakeups as | 
|  | 23 | * generated by pipes and the like, see also SYNC_WAKEUPS. | 
|  | 24 | */ | 
|  | 25 | SCHED_FEAT(AFFINE_WAKEUPS, 1) | 
|  | 26 |  | 
|  | 27 | /* | 
|  | 28 | * Prefer to schedule the task we woke last (assuming it failed | 
|  | 29 | * wakeup-preemption), since its likely going to consume data we | 
|  | 30 | * touched, increases cache locality. | 
|  | 31 | */ | 
| Mike Galbraith | 0ec9fab | 2009-09-15 15:07:03 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 32 | SCHED_FEAT(NEXT_BUDDY, 0) | 
| Peter Zijlstra | e26af0e | 2009-09-11 12:31:23 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 33 |  | 
|  | 34 | /* | 
|  | 35 | * Prefer to schedule the task that ran last (when we did | 
|  | 36 | * wake-preempt) as that likely will touch the same data, increases | 
|  | 37 | * cache locality. | 
|  | 38 | */ | 
|  | 39 | SCHED_FEAT(LAST_BUDDY, 1) | 
|  | 40 |  | 
|  | 41 | /* | 
|  | 42 | * Consider buddies to be cache hot, decreases the likelyness of a | 
|  | 43 | * cache buddy being migrated away, increases cache locality. | 
|  | 44 | */ | 
|  | 45 | SCHED_FEAT(CACHE_HOT_BUDDY, 1) | 
|  | 46 |  | 
| Peter Zijlstra | 8e6598a | 2009-09-03 13:20:03 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 47 | /* | 
|  | 48 | * Use arch dependent cpu power functions | 
|  | 49 | */ | 
|  | 50 | SCHED_FEAT(ARCH_POWER, 0) | 
|  | 51 |  | 
| Ingo Molnar | 0c4b83d | 2008-10-20 14:27:43 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 52 | SCHED_FEAT(HRTICK, 0) | 
| Peter Zijlstra | f00b45c | 2008-04-19 19:45:00 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 53 | SCHED_FEAT(DOUBLE_TICK, 0) | 
| Peter Zijlstra | efc2dea | 2008-08-20 12:44:55 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 54 | SCHED_FEAT(LB_BIAS, 1) | 
| Peter Zijlstra | 3b64089 | 2009-09-16 13:44:33 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 55 | SCHED_FEAT(LB_SHARES_UPDATE, 1) | 
| Peter Zijlstra | f5bfb7d | 2008-06-27 13:41:39 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 56 | SCHED_FEAT(ASYM_EFF_LOAD, 1) | 
| Peter Zijlstra | e26af0e | 2009-09-11 12:31:23 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 57 |  | 
|  | 58 | /* | 
|  | 59 | * Spin-wait on mutex acquisition when the mutex owner is running on | 
|  | 60 | * another cpu -- assumes that when the owner is running, it will soon | 
|  | 61 | * release the lock. Decreases scheduling overhead. | 
|  | 62 | */ | 
| Peter Zijlstra | 0d66bf6 | 2009-01-12 14:01:47 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 63 | SCHED_FEAT(OWNER_SPIN, 1) |