| Nick Piggin | 64c7c8f | 2005-11-08 21:39:04 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | CPU Scheduler implementation hints for architecture specific code | 
|  | 2 |  | 
|  | 3 | Nick Piggin, 2005 | 
|  | 4 |  | 
|  | 5 | Context switch | 
|  | 6 | ============== | 
|  | 7 | 1. Runqueue locking | 
|  | 8 | By default, the switch_to arch function is called with the runqueue | 
|  | 9 | locked. This is usually not a problem unless switch_to may need to | 
|  | 10 | take the runqueue lock. This is usually due to a wake up operation in | 
| Randy Dunlap | 90080bf | 2008-11-04 14:37:25 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 11 | the context switch. See arch/ia64/include/asm/system.h for an example. | 
| Nick Piggin | 64c7c8f | 2005-11-08 21:39:04 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 12 |  | 
|  | 13 | To request the scheduler call switch_to with the runqueue unlocked, | 
|  | 14 | you must `#define __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW` in a header file | 
|  | 15 | (typically the one where switch_to is defined). | 
|  | 16 |  | 
|  | 17 | Unlocked context switches introduce only a very minor performance | 
|  | 18 | penalty to the core scheduler implementation in the CONFIG_SMP case. | 
|  | 19 |  | 
|  | 20 | 2. Interrupt status | 
|  | 21 | By default, the switch_to arch function is called with interrupts | 
|  | 22 | disabled. Interrupts may be enabled over the call if it is likely to | 
|  | 23 | introduce a significant interrupt latency by adding the line | 
|  | 24 | `#define __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW` in the same place as for | 
|  | 25 | unlocked context switches. This define also implies | 
| Randy Dunlap | 90080bf | 2008-11-04 14:37:25 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 26 | `__ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW`. See arch/arm/include/asm/system.h for an | 
| Nick Piggin | 64c7c8f | 2005-11-08 21:39:04 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 27 | example. | 
|  | 28 |  | 
|  | 29 |  | 
|  | 30 | CPU idle | 
|  | 31 | ======== | 
|  | 32 | Your cpu_idle routines need to obey the following rules: | 
|  | 33 |  | 
|  | 34 | 1. Preempt should now disabled over idle routines. Should only | 
|  | 35 | be enabled to call schedule() then disabled again. | 
|  | 36 |  | 
|  | 37 | 2. need_resched/TIF_NEED_RESCHED is only ever set, and will never | 
|  | 38 | be cleared until the running task has called schedule(). Idle | 
|  | 39 | threads need only ever query need_resched, and may never set or | 
|  | 40 | clear it. | 
|  | 41 |  | 
|  | 42 | 3. When cpu_idle finds (need_resched() == 'true'), it should call | 
|  | 43 | schedule(). It should not call schedule() otherwise. | 
|  | 44 |  | 
|  | 45 | 4. The only time interrupts need to be disabled when checking | 
|  | 46 | need_resched is if we are about to sleep the processor until | 
|  | 47 | the next interrupt (this doesn't provide any protection of | 
|  | 48 | need_resched, it prevents losing an interrupt). | 
|  | 49 |  | 
|  | 50 | 4a. Common problem with this type of sleep appears to be: | 
|  | 51 | local_irq_disable(); | 
|  | 52 | if (!need_resched()) { | 
|  | 53 | local_irq_enable(); | 
|  | 54 | *** resched interrupt arrives here *** | 
|  | 55 | __asm__("sleep until next interrupt"); | 
|  | 56 | } | 
|  | 57 |  | 
|  | 58 | 5. TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG can be set by idle routines that do not | 
|  | 59 | need an interrupt to wake them up when need_resched goes high. | 
|  | 60 | In other words, they must be periodically polling need_resched, | 
|  | 61 | although it may be reasonable to do some background work or enter | 
|  | 62 | a low CPU priority. | 
|  | 63 |  | 
|  | 64 | 5a. If TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG is set, and we do decide to enter | 
|  | 65 | an interrupt sleep, it needs to be cleared then a memory | 
|  | 66 | barrier issued (followed by a test of need_resched with | 
|  | 67 | interrupts disabled, as explained in 3). | 
|  | 68 |  | 
| Wanlong Gao | 25eb650 | 2011-06-13 17:53:53 +0800 | [diff] [blame] | 69 | arch/x86/kernel/process.c has examples of both polling and | 
| Nick Piggin | 64c7c8f | 2005-11-08 21:39:04 -0800 | [diff] [blame] | 70 | sleeping idle functions. | 
|  | 71 |  | 
|  | 72 |  | 
|  | 73 | Possible arch/ problems | 
|  | 74 | ======================= | 
|  | 75 |  | 
|  | 76 | Possible arch problems I found (and either tried to fix or didn't): | 
|  | 77 |  | 
|  | 78 | h8300 - Is such sleeping racy vs interrupts? (See #4a). | 
|  | 79 | The H8/300 manual I found indicates yes, however disabling IRQs | 
|  | 80 | over the sleep mean only NMIs can wake it up, so can't fix easily | 
|  | 81 | without doing spin waiting. | 
|  | 82 |  | 
|  | 83 | ia64 - is safe_halt call racy vs interrupts? (does it sleep?) (See #4a) | 
|  | 84 |  | 
|  | 85 | sh64 - Is sleeping racy vs interrupts? (See #4a) | 
|  | 86 |  | 
|  | 87 | sparc - IRQs on at this point(?), change local_irq_save to _disable. | 
|  | 88 | - TODO: needs secondary CPUs to disable preempt (See #1) | 
|  | 89 |  |