| Linus Torvalds | 1da177e | 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | Started Oct 1999 by Kanoj Sarcar <kanojsarcar@yahoo.com> | 
 | 2 |  | 
 | 3 | The intent of this file is to have an uptodate, running commentary  | 
 | 4 | from different people about how locking and synchronization is done  | 
 | 5 | in the Linux vm code. | 
 | 6 |  | 
 | 7 | page_table_lock & mmap_sem | 
 | 8 | -------------------------------------- | 
 | 9 |  | 
 | 10 | Page stealers pick processes out of the process pool and scan for  | 
 | 11 | the best process to steal pages from. To guarantee the existence  | 
 | 12 | of the victim mm, a mm_count inc and a mmdrop are done in swap_out(). | 
 | 13 | Page stealers hold kernel_lock to protect against a bunch of races. | 
 | 14 | The vma list of the victim mm is also scanned by the stealer,  | 
 | 15 | and the page_table_lock is used to preserve list sanity against the | 
 | 16 | process adding/deleting to the list. This also guarantees existence | 
 | 17 | of the vma. Vma existence is not guaranteed once try_to_swap_out()  | 
 | 18 | drops the page_table_lock. To guarantee the existence of the underlying  | 
 | 19 | file structure, a get_file is done before the swapout() method is  | 
 | 20 | invoked. The page passed into swapout() is guaranteed not to be reused | 
 | 21 | for a different purpose because the page reference count due to being | 
 | 22 | present in the user's pte is not released till after swapout() returns. | 
 | 23 |  | 
 | 24 | Any code that modifies the vmlist, or the vm_start/vm_end/ | 
 | 25 | vm_flags:VM_LOCKED/vm_next of any vma *in the list* must prevent  | 
 | 26 | kswapd from looking at the chain. | 
 | 27 |  | 
 | 28 | The rules are: | 
 | 29 | 1. To scan the vmlist (look but don't touch) you must hold the | 
 | 30 |    mmap_sem with read bias, i.e. down_read(&mm->mmap_sem) | 
 | 31 | 2. To modify the vmlist you need to hold the mmap_sem with | 
 | 32 |    read&write bias, i.e. down_write(&mm->mmap_sem)  *AND* | 
 | 33 |    you need to take the page_table_lock. | 
 | 34 | 3. The swapper takes _just_ the page_table_lock, this is done | 
 | 35 |    because the mmap_sem can be an extremely long lived lock | 
 | 36 |    and the swapper just cannot sleep on that. | 
 | 37 | 4. The exception to this rule is expand_stack, which just | 
 | 38 |    takes the read lock and the page_table_lock, this is ok | 
 | 39 |    because it doesn't really modify fields anybody relies on. | 
 | 40 | 5. You must be able to guarantee that while holding page_table_lock | 
 | 41 |    or page_table_lock of mm A, you will not try to get either lock | 
 | 42 |    for mm B. | 
 | 43 |  | 
 | 44 | The caveats are: | 
 | 45 | 1. find_vma() makes use of, and updates, the mmap_cache pointer hint. | 
 | 46 | The update of mmap_cache is racy (page stealer can race with other code | 
 | 47 | that invokes find_vma with mmap_sem held), but that is okay, since it  | 
 | 48 | is a hint. This can be fixed, if desired, by having find_vma grab the | 
 | 49 | page_table_lock. | 
 | 50 |  | 
 | 51 |  | 
 | 52 | Code that add/delete elements from the vmlist chain are | 
 | 53 | 1. callers of insert_vm_struct | 
 | 54 | 2. callers of merge_segments | 
 | 55 | 3. callers of avl_remove | 
 | 56 |  | 
 | 57 | Code that changes vm_start/vm_end/vm_flags:VM_LOCKED of vma's on | 
 | 58 | the list: | 
 | 59 | 1. expand_stack | 
 | 60 | 2. mprotect | 
 | 61 | 3. mlock | 
 | 62 | 4. mremap | 
 | 63 |  | 
 | 64 | It is advisable that changes to vm_start/vm_end be protected, although  | 
 | 65 | in some cases it is not really needed. Eg, vm_start is modified by  | 
 | 66 | expand_stack(), it is hard to come up with a destructive scenario without  | 
 | 67 | having the vmlist protection in this case. | 
 | 68 |  | 
 | 69 | The page_table_lock nests with the inode i_mmap_lock and the kmem cache | 
 | 70 | c_spinlock spinlocks.  This is okay, since the kmem code asks for pages after | 
 | 71 | dropping c_spinlock.  The page_table_lock also nests with pagecache_lock and | 
 | 72 | pagemap_lru_lock spinlocks, and no code asks for memory with these locks | 
 | 73 | held. | 
 | 74 |  | 
 | 75 | The page_table_lock is grabbed while holding the kernel_lock spinning monitor. | 
 | 76 |  | 
 | 77 | The page_table_lock is a spin lock. | 
 | 78 |  | 
 | 79 | Note: PTL can also be used to guarantee that no new clones using the | 
 | 80 | mm start up ... this is a loose form of stability on mm_users. For | 
 | 81 | example, it is used in copy_mm to protect against a racing tlb_gather_mmu | 
 | 82 | single address space optimization, so that the zap_page_range (from | 
| npiggin@suse.de | 25d9e2d | 2009-08-21 02:35:05 +1000 | [diff] [blame] | 83 | truncate) does not lose sending ipi's to cloned threads that might | 
| Linus Torvalds | 1da177e | 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 84 | be spawned underneath it and go to user mode to drag in pte's into tlbs. | 
 | 85 |  | 
| Hugh Dickins | 5d337b9 | 2005-09-03 15:54:41 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 86 | swap_lock | 
 | 87 | -------------- | 
| Linus Torvalds | 1da177e | 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 88 | The swap devices are chained in priority order from the "swap_list" header.  | 
 | 89 | The "swap_list" is used for the round-robin swaphandle allocation strategy. | 
 | 90 | The #free swaphandles is maintained in "nr_swap_pages". These two together | 
| Hugh Dickins | 5d337b9 | 2005-09-03 15:54:41 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 91 | are protected by the swap_lock. | 
| Linus Torvalds | 1da177e | 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 92 |  | 
| Hugh Dickins | 5d337b9 | 2005-09-03 15:54:41 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 93 | The swap_lock also protects all the device reference counts on the | 
 | 94 | corresponding swaphandles, maintained in the "swap_map" array, and the | 
 | 95 | "highest_bit" and "lowest_bit" fields. | 
| Linus Torvalds | 1da177e | 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 96 |  | 
| Hugh Dickins | 5d337b9 | 2005-09-03 15:54:41 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 97 | The swap_lock is a spinlock, and is never acquired from intr level. | 
| Linus Torvalds | 1da177e | 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 98 |  | 
 | 99 | To prevent races between swap space deletion or async readahead swapins | 
 | 100 | deciding whether a swap handle is being used, ie worthy of being read in | 
 | 101 | from disk, and an unmap -> swap_free making the handle unused, the swap | 
 | 102 | delete and readahead code grabs a temp reference on the swaphandle to | 
 | 103 | prevent warning messages from swap_duplicate <- read_swap_cache_async. | 
 | 104 |  | 
 | 105 | Swap cache locking | 
 | 106 | ------------------ | 
 | 107 | Pages are added into the swap cache with kernel_lock held, to make sure | 
 | 108 | that multiple pages are not being added (and hence lost) by associating | 
 | 109 | all of them with the same swaphandle. | 
 | 110 |  | 
 | 111 | Pages are guaranteed not to be removed from the scache if the page is  | 
 | 112 | "shared": ie, other processes hold reference on the page or the associated  | 
 | 113 | swap handle. The only code that does not follow this rule is shrink_mmap, | 
 | 114 | which deletes pages from the swap cache if no process has a reference on  | 
 | 115 | the page (multiple processes might have references on the corresponding | 
 | 116 | swap handle though). lookup_swap_cache() races with shrink_mmap, when | 
 | 117 | establishing a reference on a scache page, so, it must check whether the | 
 | 118 | page it located is still in the swapcache, or shrink_mmap deleted it. | 
 | 119 | (This race is due to the fact that shrink_mmap looks at the page ref | 
 | 120 | count with pagecache_lock, but then drops pagecache_lock before deleting | 
 | 121 | the page from the scache). | 
 | 122 |  | 
 | 123 | do_wp_page and do_swap_page have MP races in them while trying to figure | 
 | 124 | out whether a page is "shared", by looking at the page_count + swap_count. | 
 | 125 | To preserve the sum of the counts, the page lock _must_ be acquired before | 
 | 126 | calling is_page_shared (else processes might switch their swap_count refs | 
 | 127 | to the page count refs, after the page count ref has been snapshotted). | 
 | 128 |  | 
 | 129 | Swap device deletion code currently breaks all the scache assumptions, | 
 | 130 | since it grabs neither mmap_sem nor page_table_lock. |