| Ian McDonald | 43019a5 | 2006-03-22 00:37:42 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | Table of contents | 
|  | 2 | ================= | 
|  | 3 |  | 
|  | 4 | Last updated: 20 December 2005 | 
|  | 5 |  | 
|  | 6 | Contents | 
|  | 7 | ======== | 
|  | 8 |  | 
|  | 9 | - Introduction | 
|  | 10 | - Devices not appearing | 
|  | 11 | - Finding patch that caused a bug | 
|  | 12 | -- Finding using git-bisect | 
|  | 13 | -- Finding it the old way | 
|  | 14 | - Fixing the bug | 
|  | 15 |  | 
|  | 16 | Introduction | 
|  | 17 | ============ | 
|  | 18 |  | 
|  | 19 | Always try the latest kernel from kernel.org and build from source. If you are | 
|  | 20 | not confident in doing that please report the bug to your distribution vendor | 
|  | 21 | instead of to a kernel developer. | 
|  | 22 |  | 
|  | 23 | Finding bugs is not always easy. Have a go though. If you can't find it don't | 
|  | 24 | give up. Report as much as you have found to the relevant maintainer. See | 
|  | 25 | MAINTAINERS for who that is for the subsystem you have worked on. | 
|  | 26 |  | 
|  | 27 | Before you submit a bug report read REPORTING-BUGS. | 
|  | 28 |  | 
|  | 29 | Devices not appearing | 
|  | 30 | ===================== | 
|  | 31 |  | 
|  | 32 | Often this is caused by udev. Check that first before blaming it on the | 
|  | 33 | kernel. | 
|  | 34 |  | 
|  | 35 | Finding patch that caused a bug | 
|  | 36 | =============================== | 
|  | 37 |  | 
|  | 38 |  | 
|  | 39 |  | 
|  | 40 | Finding using git-bisect | 
|  | 41 | ------------------------ | 
|  | 42 |  | 
|  | 43 | Using the provided tools with git makes finding bugs easy provided the bug is | 
|  | 44 | reproducible. | 
|  | 45 |  | 
|  | 46 | Steps to do it: | 
|  | 47 | - start using git for the kernel source | 
|  | 48 | - read the man page for git-bisect | 
|  | 49 | - have fun | 
|  | 50 |  | 
|  | 51 | Finding it the old way | 
|  | 52 | ---------------------- | 
|  | 53 |  | 
| Linus Torvalds | 1da177e | 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 54 | [Sat Mar  2 10:32:33 PST 1996 KERNEL_BUG-HOWTO lm@sgi.com (Larry McVoy)] | 
|  | 55 |  | 
|  | 56 | This is how to track down a bug if you know nothing about kernel hacking. | 
|  | 57 | It's a brute force approach but it works pretty well. | 
|  | 58 |  | 
|  | 59 | You need: | 
|  | 60 |  | 
|  | 61 | . A reproducible bug - it has to happen predictably (sorry) | 
|  | 62 | . All the kernel tar files from a revision that worked to the | 
|  | 63 | revision that doesn't | 
|  | 64 |  | 
|  | 65 | You will then do: | 
|  | 66 |  | 
|  | 67 | . Rebuild a revision that you believe works, install, and verify that. | 
|  | 68 | . Do a binary search over the kernels to figure out which one | 
|  | 69 | introduced the bug.  I.e., suppose 1.3.28 didn't have the bug, but | 
|  | 70 | you know that 1.3.69 does.  Pick a kernel in the middle and build | 
|  | 71 | that, like 1.3.50.  Build & test; if it works, pick the mid point | 
|  | 72 | between .50 and .69, else the mid point between .28 and .50. | 
|  | 73 | . You'll narrow it down to the kernel that introduced the bug.  You | 
|  | 74 | can probably do better than this but it gets tricky. | 
|  | 75 |  | 
|  | 76 | . Narrow it down to a subdirectory | 
|  | 77 |  | 
|  | 78 | - Copy kernel that works into "test".  Let's say that 3.62 works, | 
|  | 79 | but 3.63 doesn't.  So you diff -r those two kernels and come | 
|  | 80 | up with a list of directories that changed.  For each of those | 
|  | 81 | directories: | 
|  | 82 |  | 
|  | 83 | Copy the non-working directory next to the working directory | 
|  | 84 | as "dir.63". | 
|  | 85 | One directory at time, try moving the working directory to | 
|  | 86 | "dir.62" and mv dir.63 dir"time, try | 
|  | 87 |  | 
|  | 88 | mv dir dir.62 | 
|  | 89 | mv dir.63 dir | 
|  | 90 | find dir -name '*.[oa]' -print | xargs rm -f | 
|  | 91 |  | 
|  | 92 | And then rebuild and retest.  Assuming that all related | 
|  | 93 | changes were contained in the sub directory, this should | 
|  | 94 | isolate the change to a directory. | 
|  | 95 |  | 
|  | 96 | Problems: changes in header files may have occurred; I've | 
|  | 97 | found in my case that they were self explanatory - you may | 
|  | 98 | or may not want to give up when that happens. | 
|  | 99 |  | 
|  | 100 | . Narrow it down to a file | 
|  | 101 |  | 
|  | 102 | - You can apply the same technique to each file in the directory, | 
|  | 103 | hoping that the changes in that file are self contained. | 
|  | 104 |  | 
|  | 105 | . Narrow it down to a routine | 
|  | 106 |  | 
|  | 107 | - You can take the old file and the new file and manually create | 
|  | 108 | a merged file that has | 
|  | 109 |  | 
|  | 110 | #ifdef VER62 | 
|  | 111 | routine() | 
|  | 112 | { | 
|  | 113 | ... | 
|  | 114 | } | 
|  | 115 | #else | 
|  | 116 | routine() | 
|  | 117 | { | 
|  | 118 | ... | 
|  | 119 | } | 
|  | 120 | #endif | 
|  | 121 |  | 
|  | 122 | And then walk through that file, one routine at a time and | 
|  | 123 | prefix it with | 
|  | 124 |  | 
|  | 125 | #define VER62 | 
|  | 126 | /* both routines here */ | 
|  | 127 | #undef VER62 | 
|  | 128 |  | 
|  | 129 | Then recompile, retest, move the ifdefs until you find the one | 
|  | 130 | that makes the difference. | 
|  | 131 |  | 
|  | 132 | Finally, you take all the info that you have, kernel revisions, bug | 
|  | 133 | description, the extent to which you have narrowed it down, and pass | 
|  | 134 | that off to whomever you believe is the maintainer of that section. | 
|  | 135 | A post to linux.dev.kernel isn't such a bad idea if you've done some | 
|  | 136 | work to narrow it down. | 
|  | 137 |  | 
|  | 138 | If you get it down to a routine, you'll probably get a fix in 24 hours. | 
|  | 139 |  | 
|  | 140 | My apologies to Linus and the other kernel hackers for describing this | 
|  | 141 | brute force approach, it's hardly what a kernel hacker would do.  However, | 
|  | 142 | it does work and it lets non-hackers help fix bugs.  And it is cool | 
|  | 143 | because Linux snapshots will let you do this - something that you can't | 
|  | 144 | do with vendor supplied releases. | 
|  | 145 |  | 
| Ian McDonald | 43019a5 | 2006-03-22 00:37:42 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 146 | Fixing the bug | 
|  | 147 | ============== | 
|  | 148 |  | 
|  | 149 | Nobody is going to tell you how to fix bugs. Seriously. You need to work it | 
|  | 150 | out. But below are some hints on how to use the tools. | 
|  | 151 |  | 
|  | 152 | To debug a kernel, use objdump and look for the hex offset from the crash | 
|  | 153 | output to find the valid line of code/assembler. Without debug symbols, you | 
|  | 154 | will see the assembler code for the routine shown, but if your kernel has | 
|  | 155 | debug symbols the C code will also be available. (Debug symbols can be enabled | 
|  | 156 | in the kernel hacking menu of the menu configuration.) For example: | 
|  | 157 |  | 
|  | 158 | objdump -r -S -l --disassemble net/dccp/ipv4.o | 
|  | 159 |  | 
|  | 160 | NB.: you need to be at the top level of the kernel tree for this to pick up | 
|  | 161 | your C files. | 
|  | 162 |  | 
|  | 163 | If you don't have access to the code you can also debug on some crash dumps | 
|  | 164 | e.g. crash dump output as shown by Dave Miller. | 
|  | 165 |  | 
|  | 166 | >    EIP is at ip_queue_xmit+0x14/0x4c0 | 
|  | 167 | >     ... | 
|  | 168 | >    Code: 44 24 04 e8 6f 05 00 00 e9 e8 fe ff ff 8d 76 00 8d bc 27 00 00 | 
|  | 169 | >    00 00 55 57  56 53 81 ec bc 00 00 00 8b ac 24 d0 00 00 00 8b 5d 08 | 
|  | 170 | >    <8b> 83 3c 01 00 00 89 44  24 14 8b 45 28 85 c0 89 44 24 18 0f 85 | 
|  | 171 | > | 
|  | 172 | >    Put the bytes into a "foo.s" file like this: | 
|  | 173 | > | 
|  | 174 | >           .text | 
|  | 175 | >           .globl foo | 
|  | 176 | >    foo: | 
|  | 177 | >           .byte  .... /* bytes from Code: part of OOPS dump */ | 
|  | 178 | > | 
|  | 179 | >    Compile it with "gcc -c -o foo.o foo.s" then look at the output of | 
|  | 180 | >    "objdump --disassemble foo.o". | 
|  | 181 | > | 
|  | 182 | >    Output: | 
|  | 183 | > | 
|  | 184 | >    ip_queue_xmit: | 
|  | 185 | >        push       %ebp | 
|  | 186 | >        push       %edi | 
|  | 187 | >        push       %esi | 
|  | 188 | >        push       %ebx | 
|  | 189 | >        sub        $0xbc, %esp | 
|  | 190 | >        mov        0xd0(%esp), %ebp        ! %ebp = arg0 (skb) | 
|  | 191 | >        mov        0x8(%ebp), %ebx         ! %ebx = skb->sk | 
|  | 192 | >        mov        0x13c(%ebx), %eax       ! %eax = inet_sk(sk)->opt | 
|  | 193 |  | 
| Pekka Enberg | 926b289 | 2007-06-01 00:46:50 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 194 | In addition, you can use GDB to figure out the exact file and line | 
|  | 195 | number of the OOPS from the vmlinux file. If you have | 
|  | 196 | CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO enabled, you can simply copy the EIP value from the | 
|  | 197 | OOPS: | 
|  | 198 |  | 
|  | 199 | EIP:    0060:[<c021e50e>]    Not tainted VLI | 
|  | 200 |  | 
|  | 201 | And use GDB to translate that to human-readable form: | 
|  | 202 |  | 
|  | 203 | gdb vmlinux | 
|  | 204 | (gdb) l *0xc021e50e | 
|  | 205 |  | 
|  | 206 | If you don't have CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO enabled, you use the function | 
|  | 207 | offset from the OOPS: | 
|  | 208 |  | 
|  | 209 | EIP is at vt_ioctl+0xda8/0x1482 | 
|  | 210 |  | 
|  | 211 | And recompile the kernel with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO enabled: | 
|  | 212 |  | 
|  | 213 | make vmlinux | 
|  | 214 | gdb vmlinux | 
|  | 215 | (gdb) p vt_ioctl | 
|  | 216 | (gdb) l *(0x<address of vt_ioctl> + 0xda8) | 
|  | 217 |  | 
| Ian McDonald | 43019a5 | 2006-03-22 00:37:42 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 218 | Another very useful option of the Kernel Hacking section in menuconfig is | 
|  | 219 | Debug memory allocations. This will help you see whether data has been | 
|  | 220 | initialised and not set before use etc. To see the values that get assigned | 
|  | 221 | with this look at mm/slab.c and search for POISON_INUSE. When using this an | 
|  | 222 | Oops will often show the poisoned data instead of zero which is the default. | 
|  | 223 |  | 
|  | 224 | Once you have worked out a fix please submit it upstream. After all open | 
|  | 225 | source is about sharing what you do and don't you want to be recognised for | 
|  | 226 | your genius? | 
|  | 227 |  | 
|  | 228 | Please do read Documentation/SubmittingPatches though to help your code get | 
|  | 229 | accepted. |