)]}'
{
  "log": [
    {
      "commit": "1e5a74059f9059d330744eac84873b1b99657008",
      "tree": "f32f8ac76d5a6c49c1b4cd8f83155af00007fac0",
      "parents": [
        "2d46709082c062cae7cce1a15f8cd4cd81b92d88"
      ],
      "author": {
        "name": "Peter Zijlstra",
        "email": "a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl",
        "time": "Sun Oct 31 12:37:04 2010 +0100"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Ingo Molnar",
        "email": "mingo@elte.hu",
        "time": "Thu Nov 11 14:37:23 2010 +0100"
      },
      "message": "sched: Fix cross-sched-class wakeup preemption\n\nInstead of dealing with sched classes inside each check_preempt_curr()\nimplementation, pull out this logic into the generic wakeup preemption\npath.\n\nThis fixes a hang in KVM (and others) where we are waiting for the\nstop machine thread to run ...\n\nReported-by: Markus Trippelsdorf \u003cmarkus@trippelsdorf.de\u003e\nTested-by: Marcelo Tosatti \u003cmtosatti@redhat.com\u003e\nTested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky \u003csergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Peter Zijlstra \u003ca.p.zijlstra@chello.nl\u003e\nLKML-Reference: \u003c1288891946.2039.31.camel@laptop\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Ingo Molnar \u003cmingo@elte.hu\u003e\n"
    },
    {
      "commit": "2d46709082c062cae7cce1a15f8cd4cd81b92d88",
      "tree": "8222a0f18aca8a91c7929264d83bf6010a905993",
      "parents": [
        "aae6d3ddd8b90f5b2c8d79a2b914d1706d124193"
      ],
      "author": {
        "name": "Peter Zijlstra",
        "email": "a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl",
        "time": "Tue Nov 09 14:36:52 2010 +0100"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Ingo Molnar",
        "email": "mingo@elte.hu",
        "time": "Wed Nov 10 23:13:58 2010 +0100"
      },
      "message": "sched: Fix runnable condition for stoptask\n\nHeiko reported that the TASK_RUNNING check is not sufficient for\nCONFIG_PREEMPT\u003dy since we can get preempted with !TASK_RUNNING.\n\nHe suggested adding a -\u003ese.on_rq test to the existing TASK_RUNNING\none, however TASK_RUNNING will always have -\u003ese.on_rq, so we might as\nwell reduce that to a single test.\n\n[ stop tasks should never get preempted, but its good to handle\n  this case correctly should this ever happen ]\n\nReported-by: Heiko Carstens \u003cheiko.carstens@de.ibm.com\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Peter Zijlstra \u003ca.p.zijlstra@chello.nl\u003e\nLKML-Reference: \u003cnew-submission\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Ingo Molnar \u003cmingo@elte.hu\u003e\n"
    },
    {
      "commit": "34f971f6f7988be4d014eec3e3526bee6d007ffa",
      "tree": "a662e0701f81f019418b55aa1354f833277b9c40",
      "parents": [
        "4924627423d5e286136ad2520f5be536345ae590"
      ],
      "author": {
        "name": "Peter Zijlstra",
        "email": "a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl",
        "time": "Wed Sep 22 13:53:15 2010 +0200"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Ingo Molnar",
        "email": "mingo@elte.hu",
        "time": "Mon Oct 18 18:41:58 2010 +0200"
      },
      "message": "sched: Create special class for stop/migrate work\n\nIn order to separate the stop/migrate work thread from the SCHED_FIFO\nimplementation, create a special class for it that is of higher priority than\nSCHED_FIFO itself.\n\nThis currently solves a problem where cpu-hotplug consumes so much cpu-time\nthat the SCHED_FIFO class gets throttled, but has the bandwidth replenishment\ntimer pending on the now dead cpu.\n\nIt is also required for when we add the planned deadline scheduling class above\nSCHED_FIFO, as the stop/migrate thread still needs to transcent those tasks.\n\nTested-by: Heiko Carstens \u003cheiko.carstens@de.ibm.com\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Peter Zijlstra \u003ca.p.zijlstra@chello.nl\u003e\nLKML-Reference: \u003c1285165776.2275.1022.camel@laptop\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Ingo Molnar \u003cmingo@elte.hu\u003e\n"
    }
  ]
}