)]}'
{
  "log": [
    {
      "commit": "a45bce49545739a940f8bd4ca85c3b7435564893",
      "tree": "3f558e487448db9e49c8d4cd36379d9f42f93da2",
      "parents": [
        "99de055ac065e19ed69de961e97c6336a261b34e"
      ],
      "author": {
        "name": "Paul E. McKenney",
        "email": "paulmck@us.ibm.com",
        "time": "Fri Sep 29 02:00:11 2006 -0700"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Linus Torvalds",
        "email": "torvalds@g5.osdl.org",
        "time": "Fri Sep 29 09:18:13 2006 -0700"
      },
      "message": "[PATCH] memory ordering in __kfifo primitives\n\nBoth __kfifo_put() and __kfifo_get() have header comments stating that if\nthere is but one concurrent reader and one concurrent writer, locking is not\nnecessary.  This is almost the case, but a couple of memory barriers are\nneeded.  Another option would be to change the header comments to remove the\nbit about locking not being needed, and to change the those callers who\ncurrently don\u0027t use locking to add the required locking.  The attachment\nanalyzes this approach, but the patch below seems simpler.\n\nSigned-off-by: Paul E. McKenney \u003cpaulmck@us.ibm.com\u003e\nCc: Stelian Pop \u003cstelian@popies.net\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Andrew Morton \u003cakpm@osdl.org\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Linus Torvalds \u003ctorvalds@osdl.org\u003e\n"
    },
    {
      "commit": "dd0fc66fb33cd610bc1a5db8a5e232d34879b4d7",
      "tree": "51f96a9db96293b352e358f66032e1f4ff79fafb",
      "parents": [
        "3b0e77bd144203a507eb191f7117d2c5004ea1de"
      ],
      "author": {
        "name": "Al Viro",
        "email": "viro@ftp.linux.org.uk",
        "time": "Fri Oct 07 07:46:04 2005 +0100"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Linus Torvalds",
        "email": "torvalds@g5.osdl.org",
        "time": "Sat Oct 08 15:00:57 2005 -0700"
      },
      "message": "[PATCH] gfp flags annotations - part 1\n\n - added typedef unsigned int __nocast gfp_t;\n\n - replaced __nocast uses for gfp flags with gfp_t - it gives exactly\n   the same warnings as far as sparse is concerned, doesn\u0027t change\n   generated code (from gcc point of view we replaced unsigned int with\n   typedef) and documents what\u0027s going on far better.\n\nSigned-off-by: Al Viro \u003cviro@zeniv.linux.org.uk\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Linus Torvalds \u003ctorvalds@osdl.org\u003e\n"
    },
    {
      "commit": "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
      "tree": "0bba044c4ce775e45a88a51686b5d9f90697ea9d",
      "parents": [],
      "author": {
        "name": "Linus Torvalds",
        "email": "torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org",
        "time": "Sat Apr 16 15:20:36 2005 -0700"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Linus Torvalds",
        "email": "torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org",
        "time": "Sat Apr 16 15:20:36 2005 -0700"
      },
      "message": "Linux-2.6.12-rc2\n\nInitial git repository build. I\u0027m not bothering with the full history,\neven though we have it. We can create a separate \"historical\" git\narchive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it\u0027s about\n3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early\ngit days unnecessarily complicated, when we don\u0027t have a lot of good\ninfrastructure for it.\n\nLet it rip!\n"
    }
  ]
}