)]}'
{
  "log": [
    {
      "commit": "8f4d37ec073c17e2d4aa8851df5837d798606d6f",
      "tree": "a9ac9063eca53e4d0110e8086f55241ea70ba993",
      "parents": [
        "02b67cc3ba36bdba351d6c3a00593f4ec550d9d3"
      ],
      "author": {
        "name": "Peter Zijlstra",
        "email": "a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl",
        "time": "Fri Jan 25 21:08:29 2008 +0100"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Ingo Molnar",
        "email": "mingo@elte.hu",
        "time": "Fri Jan 25 21:08:29 2008 +0100"
      },
      "message": "sched: high-res preemption tick\n\nUse HR-timers (when available) to deliver an accurate preemption tick.\n\nThe regular scheduler tick that runs at 1/HZ can be too coarse when nice\nlevel are used. The fairness system will still keep the cpu utilisation \u0027fair\u0027\nby then delaying the task that got an excessive amount of CPU time but try to\nminimize this by delivering preemption points spot-on.\n\nThe average frequency of this extra interrupt is sched_latency / nr_latency.\nWhich need not be higher than 1/HZ, its just that the distribution within the\nsched_latency period is important.\n\nSigned-off-by: Peter Zijlstra \u003ca.p.zijlstra@chello.nl\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Ingo Molnar \u003cmingo@elte.hu\u003e\n"
    },
    {
      "commit": "40fcfc87222e2e8af6379ec366f0cb2a411570cd",
      "tree": "9b0e0e6a2f9c3d93ab1f0a724abd4af51d5558e1",
      "parents": [
        "d5abe669172f20a4129a711de0f250a4e07db298"
      ],
      "author": {
        "name": "Alan Cox",
        "email": "alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk",
        "time": "Wed Dec 06 20:37:27 2006 -0800"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Linus Torvalds",
        "email": "torvalds@woody.osdl.org",
        "time": "Thu Dec 07 08:39:36 2006 -0800"
      },
      "message": "[PATCH] HZ: 300Hz support\n\nFix two things.  Firstly the unit is \"Hz\" not \"HZ\".  Secondly it is useful\nto have 300Hz support when doing multimedia work.  250 is fine for us in\nEurope but the US frame rate is 30fps (29.99 blah for pedants).  300 gives\nus a tick divisible by both 25 and 30, and for interlace work 50 and 60.\nIt\u0027s also giving similar performance to 250Hz.\n\nI\u0027d argue we should remove 250 and add 300, but that might be excess\ndisruption for now.\n\nSigned-off-by: Alan Cox \u003calan@redhat.com\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Andrew Morton \u003cakpm@osdl.org\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Linus Torvalds \u003ctorvalds@osdl.org\u003e\n"
    },
    {
      "commit": "59121003721a8fad11ee72e646fd9d3076b5679c",
      "tree": "c9279c1b74cce81a9dbaf1e7fd038cd55caf26f2",
      "parents": [
        "799d19f6ec5ca2102c61122f5219a17f1c4e961a"
      ],
      "author": {
        "name": "Christoph Lameter",
        "email": "christoph@lameter.com",
        "time": "Thu Jun 23 00:08:25 2005 -0700"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Linus Torvalds",
        "email": "torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org",
        "time": "Thu Jun 23 09:45:10 2005 -0700"
      },
      "message": "[PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt\n\nMake the timer frequency selectable. The timer interrupt may cause bus\nand memory contention in large NUMA systems since the interrupt occurs\non each processor HZ times per second.\n\nSigned-off-by: Christoph Lameter \u003cchristoph@lameter.com\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Shai Fultheim \u003cshai@scalex86.org\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Andrew Morton \u003cakpm@osdl.org\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Linus Torvalds \u003ctorvalds@osdl.org\u003e\n"
    }
  ]
}