Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/chips/fwh_lock.h b/drivers/mtd/chips/fwh_lock.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fbf4470
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/fwh_lock.h
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+#ifndef FWH_LOCK_H
+#define FWH_LOCK_H
+
+
+enum fwh_lock_state {
+ FWH_UNLOCKED = 0,
+ FWH_DENY_WRITE = 1,
+ FWH_IMMUTABLE = 2,
+ FWH_DENY_READ = 4,
+};
+
+struct fwh_xxlock_thunk {
+ enum fwh_lock_state val;
+ flstate_t state;
+};
+
+
+#define FWH_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_LOCK ((struct fwh_xxlock_thunk){ FWH_DENY_WRITE, FL_LOCKING})
+#define FWH_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_UNLOCK ((struct fwh_xxlock_thunk){ FWH_UNLOCKED, FL_UNLOCKING})
+
+/*
+ * This locking/unlock is specific to firmware hub parts. Only one
+ * is known that supports the Intel command set. Firmware
+ * hub parts cannot be interleaved as they are on the LPC bus
+ * so this code has not been tested with interleaved chips,
+ * and will likely fail in that context.
+ */
+static int fwh_xxlock_oneblock(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip,
+ unsigned long adr, int len, void *thunk)
+{
+ struct cfi_private *cfi = map->fldrv_priv;
+ struct fwh_xxlock_thunk *xxlt = (struct fwh_xxlock_thunk *)thunk;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Refuse the operation if the we cannot look behind the chip */
+ if (chip->start < 0x400000) {
+ DEBUG( MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL3,
+ "MTD %s(): chip->start: %lx wanted >= 0x400000\n",
+ __func__, chip->start );
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+ /*
+ * lock block registers:
+ * - on 64k boundariesand
+ * - bit 1 set high
+ * - block lock registers are 4MiB lower - overflow subtract (danger)
+ *
+ * The address manipulation is first done on the logical address
+ * which is 0 at the start of the chip, and then the offset of
+ * the individual chip is addted to it. Any other order a weird
+ * map offset could cause problems.
+ */
+ adr = (adr & ~0xffffUL) | 0x2;
+ adr += chip->start - 0x400000;
+
+ /*
+ * This is easy because these are writes to registers and not writes
+ * to flash memory - that means that we don't have to check status
+ * and timeout.
+ */
+ cfi_spin_lock(chip->mutex);
+ ret = get_chip(map, chip, adr, FL_LOCKING);
+ if (ret) {
+ cfi_spin_unlock(chip->mutex);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ chip->state = xxlt->state;
+ map_write(map, CMD(xxlt->val), adr);
+
+ /* Done and happy. */
+ chip->state = FL_READY;
+ put_chip(map, chip, adr);
+ cfi_spin_unlock(chip->mutex);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+
+static int fwh_lock_varsize(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, size_t len)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = cfi_varsize_frob(mtd, fwh_xxlock_oneblock, ofs, len,
+ (void *)&FWH_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_LOCK);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+
+static int fwh_unlock_varsize(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, size_t len)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = cfi_varsize_frob(mtd, fwh_xxlock_oneblock, ofs, len,
+ (void *)&FWH_XXLOCK_ONEBLOCK_UNLOCK);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void fixup_use_fwh_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, void *param)
+{
+ printk(KERN_NOTICE "using fwh lock/unlock method\n");
+ /* Setup for the chips with the fwh lock method */
+ mtd->lock = fwh_lock_varsize;
+ mtd->unlock = fwh_unlock_varsize;
+}
+#endif /* FWH_LOCK_H */