Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
diff --git a/include/asm-m68k/string.h b/include/asm-m68k/string.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..44def07
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/asm-m68k/string.h
@@ -0,0 +1,542 @@
+#ifndef _M68K_STRING_H_
+#define _M68K_STRING_H_
+
+#include <asm/setup.h>
+#include <asm/page.h>
+
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_STRCPY
+static inline char * strcpy(char * dest,const char *src)
+{
+ char *xdest = dest;
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__
+ ("1:\tmoveb %1@+,%0@+\n\t"
+ "jne 1b"
+ : "=a" (dest), "=a" (src)
+ : "0" (dest), "1" (src) : "memory");
+ return xdest;
+}
+
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_STRNCPY
+static inline char * strncpy(char *dest, const char *src, size_t n)
+{
+ char *xdest = dest;
+
+ if (n == 0)
+ return xdest;
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__
+ ("1:\tmoveb %1@+,%0@+\n\t"
+ "jeq 2f\n\t"
+ "subql #1,%2\n\t"
+ "jne 1b\n\t"
+ "2:"
+ : "=a" (dest), "=a" (src), "=d" (n)
+ : "0" (dest), "1" (src), "2" (n)
+ : "memory");
+ return xdest;
+}
+
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_STRCAT
+static inline char * strcat(char * dest, const char * src)
+{
+ char *tmp = dest;
+
+ while (*dest)
+ dest++;
+ while ((*dest++ = *src++))
+ ;
+
+ return tmp;
+}
+
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_STRNCAT
+static inline char * strncat(char *dest, const char *src, size_t count)
+{
+ char *tmp = dest;
+
+ if (count) {
+ while (*dest)
+ dest++;
+ while ((*dest++ = *src++)) {
+ if (--count == 0) {
+ *dest++='\0';
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ return tmp;
+}
+
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_STRCHR
+static inline char * strchr(const char * s, int c)
+{
+ const char ch = c;
+
+ for(; *s != ch; ++s)
+ if (*s == '\0')
+ return( NULL );
+ return( (char *) s);
+}
+
+#if 0
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_STRPBRK
+static inline char *strpbrk(const char *cs,const char *ct)
+{
+ const char *sc1,*sc2;
+
+ for( sc1 = cs; *sc1 != '\0'; ++sc1)
+ for( sc2 = ct; *sc2 != '\0'; ++sc2)
+ if (*sc1 == *sc2)
+ return((char *) sc1);
+ return( NULL );
+}
+#endif
+
+#if 0
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_STRSPN
+static inline size_t strspn(const char *s, const char *accept)
+{
+ const char *p;
+ const char *a;
+ size_t count = 0;
+
+ for (p = s; *p != '\0'; ++p)
+ {
+ for (a = accept; *a != '\0'; ++a)
+ if (*p == *a)
+ break;
+ if (*a == '\0')
+ return count;
+ else
+ ++count;
+ }
+
+ return count;
+}
+#endif
+
+/* strstr !! */
+
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_STRLEN
+static inline size_t strlen(const char * s)
+{
+ const char *sc;
+ for (sc = s; *sc != '\0'; ++sc) ;
+ return(sc - s);
+}
+
+/* strnlen !! */
+
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_STRCMP
+static inline int strcmp(const char * cs,const char * ct)
+{
+ char __res;
+
+ __asm__
+ ("1:\tmoveb %0@+,%2\n\t" /* get *cs */
+ "cmpb %1@+,%2\n\t" /* compare a byte */
+ "jne 2f\n\t" /* not equal, break out */
+ "tstb %2\n\t" /* at end of cs? */
+ "jne 1b\n\t" /* no, keep going */
+ "jra 3f\n\t" /* strings are equal */
+ "2:\tsubb %1@-,%2\n\t" /* *cs - *ct */
+ "3:"
+ : "=a" (cs), "=a" (ct), "=d" (__res)
+ : "0" (cs), "1" (ct));
+ return __res;
+}
+
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_STRNCMP
+static inline int strncmp(const char * cs,const char * ct,size_t count)
+{
+ char __res;
+
+ if (!count)
+ return 0;
+ __asm__
+ ("1:\tmovb %0@+,%3\n\t" /* get *cs */
+ "cmpb %1@+,%3\n\t" /* compare a byte */
+ "jne 3f\n\t" /* not equal, break out */
+ "tstb %3\n\t" /* at end of cs? */
+ "jeq 4f\n\t" /* yes, all done */
+ "subql #1,%2\n\t" /* no, adjust count */
+ "jne 1b\n\t" /* more to do, keep going */
+ "2:\tmoveq #0,%3\n\t" /* strings are equal */
+ "jra 4f\n\t"
+ "3:\tsubb %1@-,%3\n\t" /* *cs - *ct */
+ "4:"
+ : "=a" (cs), "=a" (ct), "=d" (count), "=d" (__res)
+ : "0" (cs), "1" (ct), "2" (count));
+ return __res;
+}
+
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_MEMSET
+/*
+ * This is really ugly, but its highly optimizatiable by the
+ * compiler and is meant as compensation for gcc's missing
+ * __builtin_memset(). For the 680[23]0 it might be worth considering
+ * the optimal number of misaligned writes compared to the number of
+ * tests'n'branches needed to align the destination address. The
+ * 680[46]0 doesn't really care due to their copy-back caches.
+ * 10/09/96 - Jes Sorensen
+ */
+static inline void * __memset_g(void * s, int c, size_t count)
+{
+ void *xs = s;
+ size_t temp;
+
+ if (!count)
+ return xs;
+
+ c &= 0xff;
+ c |= c << 8;
+ c |= c << 16;
+
+ if (count < 36){
+ long *ls = s;
+
+ switch(count){
+ case 32: case 33: case 34: case 35:
+ *ls++ = c;
+ case 28: case 29: case 30: case 31:
+ *ls++ = c;
+ case 24: case 25: case 26: case 27:
+ *ls++ = c;
+ case 20: case 21: case 22: case 23:
+ *ls++ = c;
+ case 16: case 17: case 18: case 19:
+ *ls++ = c;
+ case 12: case 13: case 14: case 15:
+ *ls++ = c;
+ case 8: case 9: case 10: case 11:
+ *ls++ = c;
+ case 4: case 5: case 6: case 7:
+ *ls++ = c;
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+ s = ls;
+ if (count & 0x02){
+ short *ss = s;
+ *ss++ = c;
+ s = ss;
+ }
+ if (count & 0x01){
+ char *cs = s;
+ *cs++ = c;
+ s = cs;
+ }
+ return xs;
+ }
+
+ if ((long) s & 1)
+ {
+ char *cs = s;
+ *cs++ = c;
+ s = cs;
+ count--;
+ }
+ if (count > 2 && (long) s & 2)
+ {
+ short *ss = s;
+ *ss++ = c;
+ s = ss;
+ count -= 2;
+ }
+ temp = count >> 2;
+ if (temp)
+ {
+ long *ls = s;
+ temp--;
+ do
+ *ls++ = c;
+ while (temp--);
+ s = ls;
+ }
+ if (count & 2)
+ {
+ short *ss = s;
+ *ss++ = c;
+ s = ss;
+ }
+ if (count & 1)
+ {
+ char *cs = s;
+ *cs = c;
+ }
+ return xs;
+}
+
+/*
+ * __memset_page assumes that data is longword aligned. Most, if not
+ * all, of these page sized memsets are performed on page aligned
+ * areas, thus we do not need to check if the destination is longword
+ * aligned. Of course we suffer a serious performance loss if this is
+ * not the case but I think the risk of this ever happening is
+ * extremely small. We spend a lot of time clearing pages in
+ * get_empty_page() so I think it is worth it anyway. Besides, the
+ * 680[46]0 do not really care about misaligned writes due to their
+ * copy-back cache.
+ *
+ * The optimized case for the 680[46]0 is implemented using the move16
+ * instruction. My tests showed that this implementation is 35-45%
+ * faster than the original implementation using movel, the only
+ * caveat is that the destination address must be 16-byte aligned.
+ * 01/09/96 - Jes Sorensen
+ */
+static inline void * __memset_page(void * s,int c,size_t count)
+{
+ unsigned long data, tmp;
+ void *xs = s;
+
+ c = c & 255;
+ data = c | (c << 8);
+ data |= data << 16;
+
+#ifdef CPU_M68040_OR_M68060_ONLY
+
+ if (((unsigned long) s) & 0x0f)
+ __memset_g(s, c, count);
+ else{
+ unsigned long *sp = s;
+ *sp++ = data;
+ *sp++ = data;
+ *sp++ = data;
+ *sp++ = data;
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__("1:\t"
+ ".chip 68040\n\t"
+ "move16 %2@+,%0@+\n\t"
+ ".chip 68k\n\t"
+ "subqw #8,%2\n\t"
+ "subqw #8,%2\n\t"
+ "dbra %1,1b\n\t"
+ : "=a" (sp), "=d" (tmp)
+ : "a" (s), "0" (sp), "1" ((count - 16) / 16 - 1)
+ );
+ }
+
+#else
+ __asm__ __volatile__("1:\t"
+ "movel %2,%0@+\n\t"
+ "movel %2,%0@+\n\t"
+ "movel %2,%0@+\n\t"
+ "movel %2,%0@+\n\t"
+ "movel %2,%0@+\n\t"
+ "movel %2,%0@+\n\t"
+ "movel %2,%0@+\n\t"
+ "movel %2,%0@+\n\t"
+ "dbra %1,1b\n\t"
+ : "=a" (s), "=d" (tmp)
+ : "d" (data), "0" (s), "1" (count / 32 - 1)
+ );
+#endif
+
+ return xs;
+}
+
+extern void *memset(void *,int,__kernel_size_t);
+
+#define __memset_const(s,c,count) \
+((count==PAGE_SIZE) ? \
+ __memset_page((s),(c),(count)) : \
+ __memset_g((s),(c),(count)))
+
+#define memset(s, c, count) \
+(__builtin_constant_p(count) ? \
+ __memset_const((s),(c),(count)) : \
+ __memset_g((s),(c),(count)))
+
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_MEMCPY
+extern void * memcpy(void *, const void *, size_t );
+/*
+ * __builtin_memcpy() does not handle page-sized memcpys very well,
+ * thus following the same assumptions as for page-sized memsets, this
+ * function copies page-sized areas using an unrolled loop, without
+ * considering alignment.
+ *
+ * For the 680[46]0 only kernels we use the move16 instruction instead
+ * as it writes through the data-cache, invalidating the cache-lines
+ * touched. In this way we do not use up the entire data-cache (well,
+ * half of it on the 68060) by copying a page. An unrolled loop of two
+ * move16 instructions seem to the fastest. The only caveat is that
+ * both source and destination must be 16-byte aligned, if not we fall
+ * back to the generic memcpy function. - Jes
+ */
+static inline void * __memcpy_page(void * to, const void * from, size_t count)
+{
+ unsigned long tmp;
+ void *xto = to;
+
+#ifdef CPU_M68040_OR_M68060_ONLY
+
+ if (((unsigned long) to | (unsigned long) from) & 0x0f)
+ return memcpy(to, from, count);
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__("1:\t"
+ ".chip 68040\n\t"
+ "move16 %1@+,%0@+\n\t"
+ "move16 %1@+,%0@+\n\t"
+ ".chip 68k\n\t"
+ "dbra %2,1b\n\t"
+ : "=a" (to), "=a" (from), "=d" (tmp)
+ : "0" (to), "1" (from) , "2" (count / 32 - 1)
+ );
+#else
+ __asm__ __volatile__("1:\t"
+ "movel %1@+,%0@+\n\t"
+ "movel %1@+,%0@+\n\t"
+ "movel %1@+,%0@+\n\t"
+ "movel %1@+,%0@+\n\t"
+ "movel %1@+,%0@+\n\t"
+ "movel %1@+,%0@+\n\t"
+ "movel %1@+,%0@+\n\t"
+ "movel %1@+,%0@+\n\t"
+ "dbra %2,1b\n\t"
+ : "=a" (to), "=a" (from), "=d" (tmp)
+ : "0" (to), "1" (from) , "2" (count / 32 - 1)
+ );
+#endif
+ return xto;
+}
+
+#define __memcpy_const(to, from, n) \
+((n==PAGE_SIZE) ? \
+ __memcpy_page((to),(from),(n)) : \
+ __builtin_memcpy((to),(from),(n)))
+
+#define memcpy(to, from, n) \
+(__builtin_constant_p(n) ? \
+ __memcpy_const((to),(from),(n)) : \
+ memcpy((to),(from),(n)))
+
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_MEMMOVE
+static inline void * memmove(void * dest,const void * src, size_t n)
+{
+ void *xdest = dest;
+ size_t temp;
+
+ if (!n)
+ return xdest;
+
+ if (dest < src)
+ {
+ if ((long) dest & 1)
+ {
+ char *cdest = dest;
+ const char *csrc = src;
+ *cdest++ = *csrc++;
+ dest = cdest;
+ src = csrc;
+ n--;
+ }
+ if (n > 2 && (long) dest & 2)
+ {
+ short *sdest = dest;
+ const short *ssrc = src;
+ *sdest++ = *ssrc++;
+ dest = sdest;
+ src = ssrc;
+ n -= 2;
+ }
+ temp = n >> 2;
+ if (temp)
+ {
+ long *ldest = dest;
+ const long *lsrc = src;
+ temp--;
+ do
+ *ldest++ = *lsrc++;
+ while (temp--);
+ dest = ldest;
+ src = lsrc;
+ }
+ if (n & 2)
+ {
+ short *sdest = dest;
+ const short *ssrc = src;
+ *sdest++ = *ssrc++;
+ dest = sdest;
+ src = ssrc;
+ }
+ if (n & 1)
+ {
+ char *cdest = dest;
+ const char *csrc = src;
+ *cdest = *csrc;
+ }
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ dest = (char *) dest + n;
+ src = (const char *) src + n;
+ if ((long) dest & 1)
+ {
+ char *cdest = dest;
+ const char *csrc = src;
+ *--cdest = *--csrc;
+ dest = cdest;
+ src = csrc;
+ n--;
+ }
+ if (n > 2 && (long) dest & 2)
+ {
+ short *sdest = dest;
+ const short *ssrc = src;
+ *--sdest = *--ssrc;
+ dest = sdest;
+ src = ssrc;
+ n -= 2;
+ }
+ temp = n >> 2;
+ if (temp)
+ {
+ long *ldest = dest;
+ const long *lsrc = src;
+ temp--;
+ do
+ *--ldest = *--lsrc;
+ while (temp--);
+ dest = ldest;
+ src = lsrc;
+ }
+ if (n & 2)
+ {
+ short *sdest = dest;
+ const short *ssrc = src;
+ *--sdest = *--ssrc;
+ dest = sdest;
+ src = ssrc;
+ }
+ if (n & 1)
+ {
+ char *cdest = dest;
+ const char *csrc = src;
+ *--cdest = *--csrc;
+ }
+ }
+ return xdest;
+}
+
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_MEMCMP
+extern int memcmp(const void * ,const void * ,size_t );
+#define memcmp(cs, ct, n) \
+(__builtin_constant_p(n) ? \
+ __builtin_memcmp((cs),(ct),(n)) : \
+ memcmp((cs),(ct),(n)))
+
+#define __HAVE_ARCH_MEMCHR
+static inline void *memchr(const void *cs, int c, size_t count)
+{
+ /* Someone else can optimize this, I don't care - tonym@mac.linux-m68k.org */
+ unsigned char *ret = (unsigned char *)cs;
+ for(;count>0;count--,ret++)
+ if(*ret == c) return ret;
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+#endif /* _M68K_STRING_H_ */