)]}'
{
  "commit": "96cd5b0856a25e2ec366702e1923070ffca53dae",
  "tree": "c3526247f01c34574db43243b87a8b8bf61125c7",
  "parents": [
    "842bbaaa7394820c8f1fe0629cd15478653caf86"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Mike Kravetz",
    "email": "kravetz@us.ibm.com",
    "time": "Mon Aug 01 21:11:48 2005 -0700"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Linus Torvalds",
    "email": "torvalds@g5.osdl.org",
    "time": "Mon Aug 01 21:38:01 2005 -0700"
  },
  "message": "[PATCH] ppc64: POWER 4 fails to boot with NUMA\n\nIf CONFIG_NUMA is set, some POWER 4 systems will fail to boot.  This is\nbecause of special processing needed to handle invalid node IDs (0xffff) on\nPOWER 4.  My previous patch to handle memory \u0027holes\u0027 within nodes forgot to\nadd this special case for POWER 4 in one place.\n\nIn reality, I\u0027m not sure that configuring the kernel for NUMA on POWER 4 makes\nmuch sense.  Are there POWER 4 based systems with NUMA characteristics that\nare presented by the firmware?  But, distros want one kernel for all systems\nso NUMA is on by default in their kernels.  The patch handles those cases.\n\nSigned-off-by: Mike Kravetz \u003ckravetz@us.ibm.com\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Paul Mackerras \u003cpaulus@samba.org\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Andrew Morton \u003cakpm@osdl.org\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Linus Torvalds \u003ctorvalds@osdl.org\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "cafd91aef289ecc4354f6252be37ee5f36006f98",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "arch/ppc64/mm/numa.c",
      "new_id": "0b191f2de0163b64d20b302a92f5047aee23ed8e",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "arch/ppc64/mm/numa.c"
    }
  ]
}