Linus Torvalds | 1da177e | 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | /* $Id: semaphore.c,v 1.9 2001/11/18 00:12:56 davem Exp $ |
| 2 | * semaphore.c: Sparc64 semaphore implementation. |
| 3 | * |
| 4 | * This is basically the PPC semaphore scheme ported to use |
| 5 | * the sparc64 atomic instructions, so see the PPC code for |
| 6 | * credits. |
| 7 | */ |
| 8 | |
| 9 | #include <linux/sched.h> |
| 10 | #include <linux/errno.h> |
| 11 | #include <linux/init.h> |
| 12 | |
| 13 | /* |
| 14 | * Atomically update sem->count. |
| 15 | * This does the equivalent of the following: |
| 16 | * |
| 17 | * old_count = sem->count; |
| 18 | * tmp = MAX(old_count, 0) + incr; |
| 19 | * sem->count = tmp; |
| 20 | * return old_count; |
| 21 | */ |
| 22 | static __inline__ int __sem_update_count(struct semaphore *sem, int incr) |
| 23 | { |
| 24 | int old_count, tmp; |
| 25 | |
| 26 | __asm__ __volatile__("\n" |
| 27 | " ! __sem_update_count old_count(%0) tmp(%1) incr(%4) &sem->count(%3)\n" |
| 28 | "1: ldsw [%3], %0\n" |
| 29 | " mov %0, %1\n" |
| 30 | " cmp %0, 0\n" |
| 31 | " movl %%icc, 0, %1\n" |
| 32 | " add %1, %4, %1\n" |
| 33 | " cas [%3], %0, %1\n" |
| 34 | " cmp %0, %1\n" |
| 35 | " bne,pn %%icc, 1b\n" |
| 36 | " membar #StoreLoad | #StoreStore\n" |
| 37 | : "=&r" (old_count), "=&r" (tmp), "=m" (sem->count) |
| 38 | : "r" (&sem->count), "r" (incr), "m" (sem->count) |
| 39 | : "cc"); |
| 40 | |
| 41 | return old_count; |
| 42 | } |
| 43 | |
| 44 | static void __up(struct semaphore *sem) |
| 45 | { |
| 46 | __sem_update_count(sem, 1); |
| 47 | wake_up(&sem->wait); |
| 48 | } |
| 49 | |
| 50 | void up(struct semaphore *sem) |
| 51 | { |
| 52 | /* This atomically does: |
| 53 | * old_val = sem->count; |
| 54 | * new_val = sem->count + 1; |
| 55 | * sem->count = new_val; |
| 56 | * if (old_val < 0) |
| 57 | * __up(sem); |
| 58 | * |
| 59 | * The (old_val < 0) test is equivalent to |
| 60 | * the more straightforward (new_val <= 0), |
| 61 | * but it is easier to test the former because |
| 62 | * of how the CAS instruction works. |
| 63 | */ |
| 64 | |
| 65 | __asm__ __volatile__("\n" |
| 66 | " ! up sem(%0)\n" |
| 67 | " membar #StoreLoad | #LoadLoad\n" |
| 68 | "1: lduw [%0], %%g1\n" |
| 69 | " add %%g1, 1, %%g7\n" |
| 70 | " cas [%0], %%g1, %%g7\n" |
| 71 | " cmp %%g1, %%g7\n" |
| 72 | " bne,pn %%icc, 1b\n" |
| 73 | " addcc %%g7, 1, %%g0\n" |
| 74 | " ble,pn %%icc, 3f\n" |
| 75 | " membar #StoreLoad | #StoreStore\n" |
| 76 | "2:\n" |
| 77 | " .subsection 2\n" |
| 78 | "3: mov %0, %%g1\n" |
| 79 | " save %%sp, -160, %%sp\n" |
| 80 | " call %1\n" |
| 81 | " mov %%g1, %%o0\n" |
| 82 | " ba,pt %%xcc, 2b\n" |
| 83 | " restore\n" |
| 84 | " .previous\n" |
| 85 | : : "r" (sem), "i" (__up) |
| 86 | : "g1", "g2", "g3", "g7", "memory", "cc"); |
| 87 | } |
| 88 | |
| 89 | static void __sched __down(struct semaphore * sem) |
| 90 | { |
| 91 | struct task_struct *tsk = current; |
| 92 | DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk); |
| 93 | |
| 94 | tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE; |
| 95 | add_wait_queue_exclusive(&sem->wait, &wait); |
| 96 | |
| 97 | while (__sem_update_count(sem, -1) <= 0) { |
| 98 | schedule(); |
| 99 | tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE; |
| 100 | } |
| 101 | remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait); |
| 102 | tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING; |
| 103 | |
| 104 | wake_up(&sem->wait); |
| 105 | } |
| 106 | |
| 107 | void __sched down(struct semaphore *sem) |
| 108 | { |
| 109 | might_sleep(); |
| 110 | /* This atomically does: |
| 111 | * old_val = sem->count; |
| 112 | * new_val = sem->count - 1; |
| 113 | * sem->count = new_val; |
| 114 | * if (old_val < 1) |
| 115 | * __down(sem); |
| 116 | * |
| 117 | * The (old_val < 1) test is equivalent to |
| 118 | * the more straightforward (new_val < 0), |
| 119 | * but it is easier to test the former because |
| 120 | * of how the CAS instruction works. |
| 121 | */ |
| 122 | |
| 123 | __asm__ __volatile__("\n" |
| 124 | " ! down sem(%0)\n" |
| 125 | "1: lduw [%0], %%g1\n" |
| 126 | " sub %%g1, 1, %%g7\n" |
| 127 | " cas [%0], %%g1, %%g7\n" |
| 128 | " cmp %%g1, %%g7\n" |
| 129 | " bne,pn %%icc, 1b\n" |
| 130 | " cmp %%g7, 1\n" |
| 131 | " bl,pn %%icc, 3f\n" |
| 132 | " membar #StoreLoad | #StoreStore\n" |
| 133 | "2:\n" |
| 134 | " .subsection 2\n" |
| 135 | "3: mov %0, %%g1\n" |
| 136 | " save %%sp, -160, %%sp\n" |
| 137 | " call %1\n" |
| 138 | " mov %%g1, %%o0\n" |
| 139 | " ba,pt %%xcc, 2b\n" |
| 140 | " restore\n" |
| 141 | " .previous\n" |
| 142 | : : "r" (sem), "i" (__down) |
| 143 | : "g1", "g2", "g3", "g7", "memory", "cc"); |
| 144 | } |
| 145 | |
| 146 | int down_trylock(struct semaphore *sem) |
| 147 | { |
| 148 | int ret; |
| 149 | |
| 150 | /* This atomically does: |
| 151 | * old_val = sem->count; |
| 152 | * new_val = sem->count - 1; |
| 153 | * if (old_val < 1) { |
| 154 | * ret = 1; |
| 155 | * } else { |
| 156 | * sem->count = new_val; |
| 157 | * ret = 0; |
| 158 | * } |
| 159 | * |
| 160 | * The (old_val < 1) test is equivalent to |
| 161 | * the more straightforward (new_val < 0), |
| 162 | * but it is easier to test the former because |
| 163 | * of how the CAS instruction works. |
| 164 | */ |
| 165 | |
| 166 | __asm__ __volatile__("\n" |
| 167 | " ! down_trylock sem(%1) ret(%0)\n" |
| 168 | "1: lduw [%1], %%g1\n" |
| 169 | " sub %%g1, 1, %%g7\n" |
| 170 | " cmp %%g1, 1\n" |
| 171 | " bl,pn %%icc, 2f\n" |
| 172 | " mov 1, %0\n" |
| 173 | " cas [%1], %%g1, %%g7\n" |
| 174 | " cmp %%g1, %%g7\n" |
| 175 | " bne,pn %%icc, 1b\n" |
| 176 | " mov 0, %0\n" |
| 177 | " membar #StoreLoad | #StoreStore\n" |
| 178 | "2:\n" |
| 179 | : "=&r" (ret) |
| 180 | : "r" (sem) |
| 181 | : "g1", "g7", "memory", "cc"); |
| 182 | |
| 183 | return ret; |
| 184 | } |
| 185 | |
| 186 | static int __sched __down_interruptible(struct semaphore * sem) |
| 187 | { |
| 188 | int retval = 0; |
| 189 | struct task_struct *tsk = current; |
| 190 | DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk); |
| 191 | |
| 192 | tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE; |
| 193 | add_wait_queue_exclusive(&sem->wait, &wait); |
| 194 | |
| 195 | while (__sem_update_count(sem, -1) <= 0) { |
| 196 | if (signal_pending(current)) { |
| 197 | __sem_update_count(sem, 0); |
| 198 | retval = -EINTR; |
| 199 | break; |
| 200 | } |
| 201 | schedule(); |
| 202 | tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE; |
| 203 | } |
| 204 | tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING; |
| 205 | remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait); |
| 206 | wake_up(&sem->wait); |
| 207 | return retval; |
| 208 | } |
| 209 | |
| 210 | int __sched down_interruptible(struct semaphore *sem) |
| 211 | { |
| 212 | int ret = 0; |
| 213 | |
| 214 | might_sleep(); |
| 215 | /* This atomically does: |
| 216 | * old_val = sem->count; |
| 217 | * new_val = sem->count - 1; |
| 218 | * sem->count = new_val; |
| 219 | * if (old_val < 1) |
| 220 | * ret = __down_interruptible(sem); |
| 221 | * |
| 222 | * The (old_val < 1) test is equivalent to |
| 223 | * the more straightforward (new_val < 0), |
| 224 | * but it is easier to test the former because |
| 225 | * of how the CAS instruction works. |
| 226 | */ |
| 227 | |
| 228 | __asm__ __volatile__("\n" |
| 229 | " ! down_interruptible sem(%2) ret(%0)\n" |
| 230 | "1: lduw [%2], %%g1\n" |
| 231 | " sub %%g1, 1, %%g7\n" |
| 232 | " cas [%2], %%g1, %%g7\n" |
| 233 | " cmp %%g1, %%g7\n" |
| 234 | " bne,pn %%icc, 1b\n" |
| 235 | " cmp %%g7, 1\n" |
| 236 | " bl,pn %%icc, 3f\n" |
| 237 | " membar #StoreLoad | #StoreStore\n" |
| 238 | "2:\n" |
| 239 | " .subsection 2\n" |
| 240 | "3: mov %2, %%g1\n" |
| 241 | " save %%sp, -160, %%sp\n" |
| 242 | " call %3\n" |
| 243 | " mov %%g1, %%o0\n" |
| 244 | " ba,pt %%xcc, 2b\n" |
| 245 | " restore\n" |
| 246 | " .previous\n" |
| 247 | : "=r" (ret) |
| 248 | : "0" (ret), "r" (sem), "i" (__down_interruptible) |
| 249 | : "g1", "g2", "g3", "g7", "memory", "cc"); |
| 250 | return ret; |
| 251 | } |