)]}'
{
  "log": [
    {
      "commit": "fc9c9ab22d5650977c417ef2032d02f455011b23",
      "tree": "27f9827f559cb732c78bb713e097c8a023e76768",
      "parents": [
        "4a534f93b371e8e6e87ae302757365f0f583e06b"
      ],
      "author": {
        "name": "Bharath Ramesh",
        "email": "bramesh@vt.edu",
        "time": "Sat Apr 16 15:25:41 2005 -0700"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Linus Torvalds",
        "email": "torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org",
        "time": "Sat Apr 16 15:25:41 2005 -0700"
      },
      "message": "[PATCH] AYSNC IO using singals other than SIGIO\n\nA question on sigwaitinfo based IO mechanism in multithreaded applications.\n\nI am trying to use RT signals to notify me of IO events using RT signals\ninstead of SIGIO in a multithreaded applications.  I noticed that there was\nsome discussion on lkml during november 1999 with the subject of the\ndiscussion as \"Signal driven IO\".  In the thread I noticed that RT signals\nwere being delivered to the worker thread.  I am running 2.6.10 kernel and\nI am trying to use the very same mechanism and I find that only SIGIO being\npropogated to the worker threads and RT signals only being propogated to\nthe main thread and not the worker threads where I actually want them to be\npropogated too.  On further inspection I found that the following patch\nwhich I have attached solves the problem.\n\nI am not sure if this is a bug or feature in the kernel.\n\n\nRoland McGrath \u003croland@redhat.com\u003e said:\n\nThis relates only to fcntl F_SETSIG, which is a Linux extension.  So there is\nno POSIX issue.  When changing various things like the normal SIGIO signalling\nto do group signals, I was concerned strictly with the POSIX semantics and\ngenerally avoided touching things in the domain of Linux inventions.  That\u0027s\nwhy I didn\u0027t change this when I changed the call right next to it.  There is\nno reason I can see that F_SETSIG-requested signals shouldn\u0027t use a group\nsignal like normal SIGIO does.  I\u0027m happy to ACK this patch, there is nothing\nwrong with its change to the semantics in my book.  But neither POSIX nor I\ncare a whit what F_SETSIG does.\n\nSigned-off-by: Andrew Morton \u003cakpm@osdl.org\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Linus Torvalds \u003ctorvalds@osdl.org\u003e\n"
    },
    {
      "commit": "1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2",
      "tree": "0bba044c4ce775e45a88a51686b5d9f90697ea9d",
      "parents": [],
      "author": {
        "name": "Linus Torvalds",
        "email": "torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org",
        "time": "Sat Apr 16 15:20:36 2005 -0700"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Linus Torvalds",
        "email": "torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org",
        "time": "Sat Apr 16 15:20:36 2005 -0700"
      },
      "message": "Linux-2.6.12-rc2\n\nInitial git repository build. I\u0027m not bothering with the full history,\neven though we have it. We can create a separate \"historical\" git\narchive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it\u0027s about\n3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early\ngit days unnecessarily complicated, when we don\u0027t have a lot of good\ninfrastructure for it.\n\nLet it rip!\n"
    }
  ]
}