ACPICA: Standardize all switch() blocks
After many years, different formatting for switch() has crept in.
This change makes every switch block identical. Chao Guan.
ACPICA bugzilla 997.
References: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=997
Signed-off-by: Chao Guan <chao.guan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dscontrol.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dscontrol.c
index 7ea0f16..eb56b66 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dscontrol.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dscontrol.c
@@ -78,7 +78,6 @@
switch (op->common.aml_opcode) {
case AML_WHILE_OP:
-
/*
* If this is an additional iteration of a while loop, continue.
* There is no need to allocate a new control state.
@@ -99,7 +98,6 @@
/*lint -fallthrough */
case AML_IF_OP:
-
/*
* IF/WHILE: Create a new control state to manage these
* constructs. We need to manage these as a stack, in order
@@ -142,6 +140,7 @@
break;
default:
+
break;
}
@@ -344,6 +343,7 @@
case AML_NOOP_OP:
/* Just do nothing! */
+
break;
case AML_BREAK_POINT_OP: