ACPICA: Standardize all switch() blocks

After many years, different formatting for switch() has crept in.
This change makes every switch block identical. Chao Guan.
ACPICA bugzilla 997.

References: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=997
Signed-off-by: Chao Guan <chao.guan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/exoparg1.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/exoparg1.c
index b60c877..814b4a3 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/exoparg1.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/exoparg1.c
@@ -327,7 +327,6 @@
 			break;
 
 		case AML_FROM_BCD_OP:	/* from_bcd (BCDValue, Result) */
-
 			/*
 			 * The 64-bit ACPI integer can hold 16 4-bit BCD characters
 			 * (if table is 32-bit, integer can hold 8 BCD characters)
@@ -407,7 +406,6 @@
 			break;
 
 		case AML_COND_REF_OF_OP:	/* cond_ref_of (source_object, Result) */
-
 			/*
 			 * This op is a little strange because the internal return value is
 			 * different than the return value stored in the result descriptor
@@ -442,13 +440,14 @@
 			goto cleanup;
 
 		default:
+
 			/* No other opcodes get here */
+
 			break;
 		}
 		break;
 
 	case AML_STORE_OP:	/* Store (Source, Target) */
-
 		/*
 		 * A store operand is typically a number, string, buffer or lvalue
 		 * Be careful about deleting the source object,
@@ -615,7 +614,6 @@
 
 	case AML_DECREMENT_OP:	/* Decrement (Operand)  */
 	case AML_INCREMENT_OP:	/* Increment (Operand)  */
-
 		/*
 		 * Create a new integer. Can't just get the base integer and
 		 * increment it because it may be an Arg or Field.
@@ -682,7 +680,6 @@
 		break;
 
 	case AML_TYPE_OP:	/* object_type (source_object) */
-
 		/*
 		 * Note: The operand is not resolved at this point because we want to
 		 * get the associated object, not its value. For example, we don't
@@ -709,7 +706,6 @@
 		break;
 
 	case AML_SIZE_OF_OP:	/* size_of (source_object) */
-
 		/*
 		 * Note: The operand is not resolved at this point because we want to
 		 * get the associated object, not its value.
@@ -735,10 +731,12 @@
 		 */
 		switch (type) {
 		case ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER:
+
 			value = acpi_gbl_integer_byte_width;
 			break;
 
 		case ACPI_TYPE_STRING:
+
 			value = temp_desc->string.length;
 			break;
 
@@ -759,6 +757,7 @@
 			break;
 
 		default:
+
 			ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO,
 				    "Operand must be Buffer/Integer/String/Package - found type %s",
 				    acpi_ut_get_type_name(type)));
@@ -860,9 +859,11 @@
 				break;
 
 			case ACPI_TYPE_STRING:
+
 				break;
 
 			default:
+
 				status = AE_AML_OPERAND_TYPE;
 				goto cleanup;
 			}
@@ -923,7 +924,6 @@
 			 */
 			switch (operand[0]->reference.class) {
 			case ACPI_REFCLASS_INDEX:
-
 				/*
 				 * The target type for the Index operator must be
 				 * either a Buffer or a Package
@@ -956,7 +956,6 @@
 					break;
 
 				case ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE:
-
 					/*
 					 * Return the referenced element of the package. We must
 					 * add another reference to the referenced object, however.
@@ -999,6 +998,7 @@
 				break;
 
 			default:
+
 				ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO,
 					    "Unknown class in reference(%p) - 0x%2.2X",
 					    operand[0],