ACPICA: Standardize all switch() blocks
After many years, different formatting for switch() has crept in.
This change makes every switch block identical. Chao Guan.
ACPICA bugzilla 997.
References: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=997
Signed-off-by: Chao Guan <chao.guan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/rsutils.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/rsutils.c
index 59bdf37..480b6b4 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/rsutils.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/rsutils.c
@@ -147,6 +147,7 @@
case ACPI_RSC_MOVE_GPIO_RES:
case ACPI_RSC_MOVE_SERIAL_VEN:
case ACPI_RSC_MOVE_SERIAL_RES:
+
ACPI_MEMCPY(destination, source, item_count);
return;
@@ -157,21 +158,25 @@
*/
case ACPI_RSC_MOVE16:
case ACPI_RSC_MOVE_GPIO_PIN:
+
ACPI_MOVE_16_TO_16(&ACPI_CAST_PTR(u16, destination)[i],
&ACPI_CAST_PTR(u16, source)[i]);
break;
case ACPI_RSC_MOVE32:
+
ACPI_MOVE_32_TO_32(&ACPI_CAST_PTR(u32, destination)[i],
&ACPI_CAST_PTR(u32, source)[i]);
break;
case ACPI_RSC_MOVE64:
+
ACPI_MOVE_64_TO_64(&ACPI_CAST_PTR(u64, destination)[i],
&ACPI_CAST_PTR(u64, source)[i]);
break;
default:
+
return;
}
}