)]}'
{
  "commit": "2c838197751db19d08a00e633e33dce23a69fb0c",
  "tree": "a7a6a4a59656cd52a9c814defbf34ea6b29774f3",
  "parents": [
    "c68cb23dde29fb107575656effa46f7b9440ac04"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Len Brown",
    "email": "len.brown@intel.com",
    "time": "Thu Dec 27 23:55:13 2007 -0500"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Len Brown",
    "email": "len.brown@intel.com",
    "time": "Thu Dec 27 23:55:13 2007 -0500"
  },
  "message": "increase PNP_MAX_PORT to 40 from 24\n\na7839e960675b549f06209d18283d5cee2ce9261\n(PNP: increase the maximum number of resources)\nincreased PNP_MAX_PORT to 24 from 8.\nIt also added a test and a complaint when a\nmachine exceeded the limit, causing:\n\npnpacpi: exceeded the max number of IO resources: 24\n\nhttp://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id\u003d9535\n\nWe should have been squawking about this all along,\nas this is a potentially serious issue.\n\nFor now, simply burn some dynamic bytes and\nincrease the limit by another 16 to 40.\nThere is no guarantee that this will satisfy\nevery system on Earth.  It probably will not,\nbut it should be an improvement.\n\nIn the future, PNPACPI should allocate resource\nstructures as needed, rather than max-sized arrays.\n\nSigned-off-by: Len Brown \u003clen.brown@intel.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "0a0426c2867d7f03bbf257887d588db4ea0be7af",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "include/linux/pnp.h",
      "new_id": "2a6d62c7d2d1a5d8f58baad15d82e9a198eb4993",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "include/linux/pnp.h"
    }
  ]
}