x86: Fix section mismatch in LAPIC initialization
Additionally doing things conditionally upon smp_processor_id()
being zero is generally a bad idea, as this means CPU 0 cannot
be offlined and brought back online later again.
While there may be other places where this is done, I think adding
more of those should be avoided so that some day SMP can really
become "symmetrical".
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <4D525C7E0200007800030EE1@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
index 06c196d..76b96d7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
@@ -1381,12 +1381,17 @@
#endif
apic_pm_activate();
+}
+
+void __init bsp_end_local_APIC_setup(void)
+{
+ end_local_APIC_setup();
/*
* Now that local APIC setup is completed for BP, configure the fault
* handling for interrupt remapping.
*/
- if (!smp_processor_id() && intr_remapping_enabled)
+ if (intr_remapping_enabled)
enable_drhd_fault_handling();
}
@@ -1756,7 +1761,7 @@
enable_IO_APIC();
#endif
- end_local_APIC_setup();
+ bsp_end_local_APIC_setup();
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
if (smp_found_config && !skip_ioapic_setup && nr_ioapics)