gpio: mcp23s08: rename the device tree property
The device tree property should be more descriptive.
microchip seems more reasonable than mcp. The old mcp
prefix is still supported but marked as deprecated.
Users of mcp have to switch to the microchip prefix.
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@lemonage.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c
index d96bf8a..2deb0c5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c
@@ -483,10 +483,21 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_SPI_MASTER
static struct of_device_id mcp23s08_spi_of_match[] = {
{
- .compatible = "mcp,mcp23s08", .data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_S08,
+ .compatible = "microchip,mcp23s08",
+ .data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_S08,
},
{
- .compatible = "mcp,mcp23s17", .data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_S17,
+ .compatible = "microchip,mcp23s17",
+ .data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_S17,
+ },
+/* NOTE: The use of the mcp prefix is deprecated and will be removed. */
+ {
+ .compatible = "mcp,mcp23s08",
+ .data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_S08,
+ },
+ {
+ .compatible = "mcp,mcp23s17",
+ .data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_S17,
},
{ },
};
@@ -496,10 +507,21 @@
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C)
static struct of_device_id mcp23s08_i2c_of_match[] = {
{
- .compatible = "mcp,mcp23008", .data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_008,
+ .compatible = "microchip,mcp23008",
+ .data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_008,
},
{
- .compatible = "mcp,mcp23017", .data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_017,
+ .compatible = "microchip,mcp23017",
+ .data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_017,
+ },
+/* NOTE: The use of the mcp prefix is deprecated and will be removed. */
+ {
+ .compatible = "mcp,mcp23008",
+ .data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_008,
+ },
+ {
+ .compatible = "mcp,mcp23017",
+ .data = (void *) MCP_TYPE_017,
},
{ },
};
@@ -620,10 +642,15 @@
if (match) {
type = (int)match->data;
status = of_property_read_u32(spi->dev.of_node,
- "mcp,spi-present-mask", &spi_present_mask);
+ "microchip,spi-present-mask", &spi_present_mask);
if (status) {
- dev_err(&spi->dev, "DT has no spi-present-mask\n");
- return -ENODEV;
+ status = of_property_read_u32(spi->dev.of_node,
+ "mcp,spi-present-mask", &spi_present_mask);
+ if (status) {
+ dev_err(&spi->dev,
+ "DT has no spi-present-mask\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
}
if ((spi_present_mask <= 0) || (spi_present_mask >= 256)) {
dev_err(&spi->dev, "invalid spi-present-mask\n");