[PATCH] i386: move phys_proc_id and cpu_core_id to cpuinfo_x86
Move the phys_core_id and cpu_core_id to cpuinfo_x86 structure. Similar
patch for x86_64 is already accepted by Andi earlier this week.
[akpm@osdl.org: fix warning]
Signed-off-by: Rohit Seth <rohitseth@google.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/common.c
index 640364d..2fa401f 100644
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@
early_intel_workaround(c);
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_HT
- phys_proc_id[smp_processor_id()] = (cpuid_ebx(1) >> 24) & 0xff;
+ c->phys_proc_id = (cpuid_ebx(1) >> 24) & 0xff;
#endif
}
@@ -477,11 +477,9 @@
{
u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
int index_msb, core_bits;
- int cpu = smp_processor_id();
cpuid(1, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
-
if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_HT) || cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CMP_LEGACY))
return;
@@ -492,16 +490,17 @@
} else if (smp_num_siblings > 1 ) {
if (smp_num_siblings > NR_CPUS) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "CPU: Unsupported number of the siblings %d", smp_num_siblings);
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "CPU: Unsupported number of the "
+ "siblings %d", smp_num_siblings);
smp_num_siblings = 1;
return;
}
index_msb = get_count_order(smp_num_siblings);
- phys_proc_id[cpu] = phys_pkg_id((ebx >> 24) & 0xFF, index_msb);
+ c->phys_proc_id = phys_pkg_id((ebx >> 24) & 0xFF, index_msb);
printk(KERN_INFO "CPU: Physical Processor ID: %d\n",
- phys_proc_id[cpu]);
+ c->phys_proc_id);
smp_num_siblings = smp_num_siblings / c->x86_max_cores;
@@ -509,12 +508,12 @@
core_bits = get_count_order(c->x86_max_cores);
- cpu_core_id[cpu] = phys_pkg_id((ebx >> 24) & 0xFF, index_msb) &
+ c->cpu_core_id = phys_pkg_id((ebx >> 24) & 0xFF, index_msb) &
((1 << core_bits) - 1);
if (c->x86_max_cores > 1)
printk(KERN_INFO "CPU: Processor Core ID: %d\n",
- cpu_core_id[cpu]);
+ c->cpu_core_id);
}
}
#endif