x86: rename the struct pt_regs members for 32/64-bit consistency
We have a lot of code which differs only by the naming of specific
members of structures that contain registers. In order to enable
additional unifications, this patch drops the e- or r- size prefix
from the register names in struct pt_regs, and drops the x- prefixes
for segment registers on the 32-bit side.
This patch also performs the equivalent renames in some additional
places that might be candidates for unification in the future.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/time_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/time_32.c
index 2dcbb81..1a89e93 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/time_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/time_32.c
@@ -49,15 +49,15 @@
unsigned long pc = instruction_pointer(regs);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- if (!v8086_mode(regs) && SEGMENT_IS_KERNEL_CODE(regs->xcs) &&
+ if (!v8086_mode(regs) && SEGMENT_IS_KERNEL_CODE(regs->cs) &&
in_lock_functions(pc)) {
#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
- return *(unsigned long *)(regs->ebp + 4);
+ return *(unsigned long *)(regs->bp + 4);
#else
- unsigned long *sp = (unsigned long *)®s->esp;
+ unsigned long *sp = (unsigned long *)®s->sp;
/* Return address is either directly at stack pointer
- or above a saved eflags. Eflags has bits 22-31 zero,
+ or above a saved flags. Eflags has bits 22-31 zero,
kernel addresses don't. */
if (sp[0] >> 22)
return sp[0];