microblaze: Fix coding style issues
Fix coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/kernel/setup.c b/arch/microblaze/kernel/setup.c
index 686b6ba..0263da7 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/microblaze/kernel/setup.c
@@ -150,33 +150,35 @@
/* printk("TLB1 0x%08x, TLB0 0x%08x, tlb 0x%x\n", tlb0,
tlb1, kernel_tlb); */
- printk("Ramdisk addr 0x%08x, ", ram);
+ pr_info("Ramdisk addr 0x%08x, ", ram);
if (fdt)
- printk("FDT at 0x%08x\n", fdt);
+ pr_info("FDT at 0x%08x\n", fdt);
else
- printk("Compiled-in FDT at 0x%08x\n",
+ pr_info("Compiled-in FDT at 0x%08x\n",
(unsigned int)_fdt_start);
#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_UCLINUX
- printk("Found romfs @ 0x%08x (0x%08x)\n",
+ pr_info("Found romfs @ 0x%08x (0x%08x)\n",
romfs_base, romfs_size);
- printk("#### klimit %p ####\n", old_klimit);
+ pr_info("#### klimit %p ####\n", old_klimit);
BUG_ON(romfs_size < 0); /* What else can we do? */
- printk("Moved 0x%08x bytes from 0x%08x to 0x%08x\n",
+ pr_info("Moved 0x%08x bytes from 0x%08x to 0x%08x\n",
romfs_size, romfs_base, (unsigned)&__bss_stop);
- printk("New klimit: 0x%08x\n", (unsigned)klimit);
+ pr_info("New klimit: 0x%08x\n", (unsigned)klimit);
#endif
#if CONFIG_XILINX_MICROBLAZE0_USE_MSR_INSTR
- if (msr)
- printk("!!!Your kernel has setup MSR instruction but "
- "CPU don't have it %x\n", msr);
+ if (msr) {
+ pr_info("!!!Your kernel has setup MSR instruction but ");
+ pr_cont("CPU don't have it %x\n", msr);
+ }
#else
- if (!msr)
- printk("!!!Your kernel not setup MSR instruction but "
- "CPU have it %x\n", msr);
+ if (!msr) {
+ pr_info("!!!Your kernel not setup MSR instruction but ");
+ pr_cont"CPU have it %x\n", msr);
+ }
#endif
/* Do not copy reset vectors. offset = 0x2 means skip the first