Btrfs: use 'u64' rather than 'int' to get extent's generation
We define a 'int' to get extent's generation by mistake,fix it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
index 92eb483..a5f6a80 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
@@ -3263,7 +3263,7 @@
struct rb_node *rb_node;
u32 item_size;
int level = -1;
- int generation;
+ u64 generation;
eb = path->nodes[0];
item_size = btrfs_item_size_nr(eb, path->slots[0]);