don't expose I_NEW inodes via dentry->d_inode
d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
unlock_new_inode(inode);
is a bad idea; do it the other way round...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
diff --git a/fs/ext2/namei.c b/fs/ext2/namei.c
index 9ba7de0..73b0d95 100644
--- a/fs/ext2/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/namei.c
@@ -41,8 +41,8 @@
{
int err = ext2_add_link(dentry, inode);
if (!err) {
- d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
unlock_new_inode(inode);
+ d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
return 0;
}
inode_dec_link_count(inode);
@@ -242,8 +242,8 @@
if (err)
goto out_fail;
- d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
unlock_new_inode(inode);
+ d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
out:
return err;