xfs: clean up xfs_ioerror_alert
Instead of passing the block number and mount structure explicitly
get them off the bp and fix make the argument order more natural.
Also move it to xfs_buf.c and stop printing the device name given
that we already get the fs name as part of xfs_alert, and we know
what device is operates on because of the caller that gets printed,
finally rename it to xfs_buf_ioerror_alert and pass __func__ as
argument where it makes sense.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c
index 86f1928..597d044 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c
@@ -92,24 +92,6 @@
}
/*
- * Prints out an ALERT message about I/O error.
- */
-void
-xfs_ioerror_alert(
- char *func,
- struct xfs_mount *mp,
- xfs_buf_t *bp,
- xfs_daddr_t blkno)
-{
- xfs_alert(mp,
- "I/O error occurred: meta-data dev %s block 0x%llx"
- " (\"%s\") error %d buf count %zd",
- xfs_buf_target_name(bp->b_target),
- (__uint64_t)blkno, func,
- bp->b_error, XFS_BUF_COUNT(bp));
-}
-
-/*
* This isn't an absolute requirement, but it is
* just a good idea to call xfs_read_buf instead of
* directly doing a read_buf call. For one, we shouldn't
@@ -143,7 +125,7 @@
} else {
*bpp = NULL;
if (error) {
- xfs_ioerror_alert("xfs_read_buf", mp, bp, XFS_BUF_ADDR(bp));
+ xfs_buf_ioerror_alert(bp, __func__);
} else {
error = XFS_ERROR(EIO);
}