|  | CONFIG_RCU_TRACE debugfs Files and Formats | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | The rcutree implementation of RCU provides debugfs trace output that | 
|  | summarizes counters and state.  This information is useful for debugging | 
|  | RCU itself, and can sometimes also help to debug abuses of RCU. | 
|  | The following sections describe the debugfs files and formats. | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | Hierarchical RCU debugfs Files and Formats | 
|  |  | 
|  | This implementation of RCU provides three debugfs files under the | 
|  | top-level directory RCU: rcu/rcudata (which displays fields in struct | 
|  | rcu_data), rcu/rcugp (which displays grace-period counters), and | 
|  | rcu/rcuhier (which displays the struct rcu_node hierarchy). | 
|  |  | 
|  | The output of "cat rcu/rcudata" looks as follows: | 
|  |  | 
|  | rcu_sched: | 
|  | 0 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=10951/1 dn=0 df=1101 of=0 ri=36 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 1 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=16117/1 dn=0 df=1015 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 2 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=1445/1 dn=0 df=1839 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 3 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=6681/1 dn=0 df=1545 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 4 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=1003/1 dn=0 df=1992 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 5 c=17829 g=17830 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=1 dt=3887/1 dn=0 df=3331 of=0 ri=4 ql=2 b=10 | 
|  | 6 c=17829 g=17829 pq=1 pqc=17829 qp=0 dt=859/1 dn=0 df=3224 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 7 c=17829 g=17830 pq=0 pqc=17829 qp=1 dt=3761/1 dn=0 df=1818 of=0 ri=0 ql=2 b=10 | 
|  | rcu_bh: | 
|  | 0 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=10951/1 dn=0 df=0 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 1 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=16117/1 dn=0 df=13 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 2 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=1445/1 dn=0 df=15 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 3 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=6681/1 dn=0 df=9 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 4 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=1003/1 dn=0 df=15 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 5 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=3887/1 dn=0 df=15 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 6 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=859/1 dn=0 df=15 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  | 7 c=-275 g=-275 pq=1 pqc=-275 qp=0 dt=3761/1 dn=0 df=15 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | 
|  |  | 
|  | The first section lists the rcu_data structures for rcu_sched, the second | 
|  | for rcu_bh.  Note that CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels will have an | 
|  | additional section for rcu_preempt.  Each section has one line per CPU, | 
|  | or eight for this 8-CPU system.  The fields are as follows: | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	The number at the beginning of each line is the CPU number. | 
|  | CPUs numbers followed by an exclamation mark are offline, | 
|  | but have been online at least once since boot.	There will be | 
|  | no output for CPUs that have never been online, which can be | 
|  | a good thing in the surprisingly common case where NR_CPUS is | 
|  | substantially larger than the number of actual CPUs. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"c" is the count of grace periods that this CPU believes have | 
|  | completed.  CPUs in dynticks idle mode may lag quite a ways | 
|  | behind, for example, CPU 4 under "rcu_sched" above, which has | 
|  | slept through the past 25 RCU grace periods.  It is not unusual | 
|  | to see CPUs lagging by thousands of grace periods. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"g" is the count of grace periods that this CPU believes have | 
|  | started.  Again, CPUs in dynticks idle mode may lag behind. | 
|  | If the "c" and "g" values are equal, this CPU has already | 
|  | reported a quiescent state for the last RCU grace period that | 
|  | it is aware of, otherwise, the CPU believes that it owes RCU a | 
|  | quiescent state. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"pq" indicates that this CPU has passed through a quiescent state | 
|  | for the current grace period.  It is possible for "pq" to be | 
|  | "1" and "c" different than "g", which indicates that although | 
|  | the CPU has passed through a quiescent state, either (1) this | 
|  | CPU has not yet reported that fact, (2) some other CPU has not | 
|  | yet reported for this grace period, or (3) both. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"pqc" indicates which grace period the last-observed quiescent | 
|  | state for this CPU corresponds to.  This is important for handling | 
|  | the race between CPU 0 reporting an extended dynticks-idle | 
|  | quiescent state for CPU 1 and CPU 1 suddenly waking up and | 
|  | reporting its own quiescent state.  If CPU 1 was the last CPU | 
|  | for the current grace period, then the CPU that loses this race | 
|  | will attempt to incorrectly mark CPU 1 as having checked in for | 
|  | the next grace period! | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"qp" indicates that RCU still expects a quiescent state from | 
|  | this CPU. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"dt" is the current value of the dyntick counter that is incremented | 
|  | when entering or leaving dynticks idle state, either by the | 
|  | scheduler or by irq.  The number after the "/" is the interrupt | 
|  | nesting depth when in dyntick-idle state, or one greater than | 
|  | the interrupt-nesting depth otherwise. | 
|  |  | 
|  | This field is displayed only for CONFIG_NO_HZ kernels. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"dn" is the current value of the dyntick counter that is incremented | 
|  | when entering or leaving dynticks idle state via NMI.  If both | 
|  | the "dt" and "dn" values are even, then this CPU is in dynticks | 
|  | idle mode and may be ignored by RCU.  If either of these two | 
|  | counters is odd, then RCU must be alert to the possibility of | 
|  | an RCU read-side critical section running on this CPU. | 
|  |  | 
|  | This field is displayed only for CONFIG_NO_HZ kernels. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"df" is the number of times that some other CPU has forced a | 
|  | quiescent state on behalf of this CPU due to this CPU being in | 
|  | dynticks-idle state. | 
|  |  | 
|  | This field is displayed only for CONFIG_NO_HZ kernels. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"of" is the number of times that some other CPU has forced a | 
|  | quiescent state on behalf of this CPU due to this CPU being | 
|  | offline.  In a perfect world, this might neve happen, but it | 
|  | turns out that offlining and onlining a CPU can take several grace | 
|  | periods, and so there is likely to be an extended period of time | 
|  | when RCU believes that the CPU is online when it really is not. | 
|  | Please note that erring in the other direction (RCU believing a | 
|  | CPU is offline when it is really alive and kicking) is a fatal | 
|  | error, so it makes sense to err conservatively. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"ri" is the number of times that RCU has seen fit to send a | 
|  | reschedule IPI to this CPU in order to get it to report a | 
|  | quiescent state. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"ql" is the number of RCU callbacks currently residing on | 
|  | this CPU.  This is the total number of callbacks, regardless | 
|  | of what state they are in (new, waiting for grace period to | 
|  | start, waiting for grace period to end, ready to invoke). | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"b" is the batch limit for this CPU.  If more than this number | 
|  | of RCU callbacks is ready to invoke, then the remainder will | 
|  | be deferred. | 
|  |  | 
|  | There is also an rcu/rcudata.csv file with the same information in | 
|  | comma-separated-variable spreadsheet format. | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | The output of "cat rcu/rcugp" looks as follows: | 
|  |  | 
|  | rcu_sched: completed=33062  gpnum=33063 | 
|  | rcu_bh: completed=464  gpnum=464 | 
|  |  | 
|  | Again, this output is for both "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh".  Note that | 
|  | kernels built with CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU will have an additional | 
|  | "rcu_preempt" line.  The fields are taken from the rcu_state structure, | 
|  | and are as follows: | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"completed" is the number of grace periods that have completed. | 
|  | It is comparable to the "c" field from rcu/rcudata in that a | 
|  | CPU whose "c" field matches the value of "completed" is aware | 
|  | that the corresponding RCU grace period has completed. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"gpnum" is the number of grace periods that have started.  It is | 
|  | comparable to the "g" field from rcu/rcudata in that a CPU | 
|  | whose "g" field matches the value of "gpnum" is aware that the | 
|  | corresponding RCU grace period has started. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If these two fields are equal (as they are for "rcu_bh" above), | 
|  | then there is no grace period in progress, in other words, RCU | 
|  | is idle.  On the other hand, if the two fields differ (as they | 
|  | do for "rcu_sched" above), then an RCU grace period is in progress. | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | The output of "cat rcu/rcuhier" looks as follows, with very long lines: | 
|  |  | 
|  | c=6902 g=6903 s=2 jfq=3 j=72c7 nfqs=13142/nfqsng=0(13142) fqlh=6 oqlen=0 | 
|  | 1/1 .>. 0:127 ^0 | 
|  | 3/3 .>. 0:35 ^0    0/0 .>. 36:71 ^1    0/0 .>. 72:107 ^2    0/0 .>. 108:127 ^3 | 
|  | 3/3f .>. 0:5 ^0    2/3 .>. 6:11 ^1    0/0 .>. 12:17 ^2    0/0 .>. 18:23 ^3    0/0 .>. 24:29 ^4    0/0 .>. 30:35 ^5    0/0 .>. 36:41 ^0    0/0 .>. 42:47 ^1    0/0 .>. 48:53 ^2    0/0 .>. 54:59 ^3    0/0 .>. 60:65 ^4    0/0 .>. 66:71 ^5    0/0 .>. 72:77 ^0    0/0 .>. 78:83 ^1    0/0 .>. 84:89 ^2    0/0 .>. 90:95 ^3    0/0 .>. 96:101 ^4    0/0 .>. 102:107 ^5    0/0 .>. 108:113 ^0    0/0 .>. 114:119 ^1    0/0 .>. 120:125 ^2    0/0 .>. 126:127 ^3 | 
|  | rcu_bh: | 
|  | c=-226 g=-226 s=1 jfq=-5701 j=72c7 nfqs=88/nfqsng=0(88) fqlh=0 oqlen=0 | 
|  | 0/1 .>. 0:127 ^0 | 
|  | 0/3 .>. 0:35 ^0    0/0 .>. 36:71 ^1    0/0 .>. 72:107 ^2    0/0 .>. 108:127 ^3 | 
|  | 0/3f .>. 0:5 ^0    0/3 .>. 6:11 ^1    0/0 .>. 12:17 ^2    0/0 .>. 18:23 ^3    0/0 .>. 24:29 ^4    0/0 .>. 30:35 ^5    0/0 .>. 36:41 ^0    0/0 .>. 42:47 ^1    0/0 .>. 48:53 ^2    0/0 .>. 54:59 ^3    0/0 .>. 60:65 ^4    0/0 .>. 66:71 ^5    0/0 .>. 72:77 ^0    0/0 .>. 78:83 ^1    0/0 .>. 84:89 ^2    0/0 .>. 90:95 ^3    0/0 .>. 96:101 ^4    0/0 .>. 102:107 ^5    0/0 .>. 108:113 ^0    0/0 .>. 114:119 ^1    0/0 .>. 120:125 ^2    0/0 .>. 126:127 ^3 | 
|  |  | 
|  | This is once again split into "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh" portions, | 
|  | and CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels will again have an additional | 
|  | "rcu_preempt" section.  The fields are as follows: | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"c" is exactly the same as "completed" under rcu/rcugp. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"g" is exactly the same as "gpnum" under rcu/rcugp. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"s" is the "signaled" state that drives force_quiescent_state()'s | 
|  | state machine. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"jfq" is the number of jiffies remaining for this grace period | 
|  | before force_quiescent_state() is invoked to help push things | 
|  | along.  Note that CPUs in dyntick-idle mode thoughout the grace | 
|  | period will not report on their own, but rather must be check by | 
|  | some other CPU via force_quiescent_state(). | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"j" is the low-order four hex digits of the jiffies counter. | 
|  | Yes, Paul did run into a number of problems that turned out to | 
|  | be due to the jiffies counter no longer counting.  Why do you ask? | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"nfqs" is the number of calls to force_quiescent_state() since | 
|  | boot. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"nfqsng" is the number of useless calls to force_quiescent_state(), | 
|  | where there wasn't actually a grace period active.  This can | 
|  | happen due to races.  The number in parentheses is the difference | 
|  | between "nfqs" and "nfqsng", or the number of times that | 
|  | force_quiescent_state() actually did some real work. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"fqlh" is the number of calls to force_quiescent_state() that | 
|  | exited immediately (without even being counted in nfqs above) | 
|  | due to contention on ->fqslock. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"oqlen" is the number of callbacks on the "orphan" callback | 
|  | list.  RCU callbacks are placed on this list by CPUs going | 
|  | offline, and are "adopted" either by the CPU helping the outgoing | 
|  | CPU or by the next rcu_barrier*() call, whichever comes first. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	Each element of the form "1/1 0:127 ^0" represents one struct | 
|  | rcu_node.  Each line represents one level of the hierarchy, from | 
|  | root to leaves.  It is best to think of the rcu_data structures | 
|  | as forming yet another level after the leaves.  Note that there | 
|  | might be either one, two, or three levels of rcu_node structures, | 
|  | depending on the relationship between CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT and | 
|  | CONFIG_NR_CPUS. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	The numbers separated by the "/" are the qsmask followed | 
|  | by the qsmaskinit.  The qsmask will have one bit | 
|  | set for each entity in the next lower level that | 
|  | has not yet checked in for the current grace period. | 
|  | The qsmaskinit will have one bit for each entity that is | 
|  | currently expected to check in during each grace period. | 
|  | The value of qsmaskinit is assigned to that of qsmask | 
|  | at the beginning of each grace period. | 
|  |  | 
|  | For example, for "rcu_sched", the qsmask of the first | 
|  | entry of the lowest level is 0x14, meaning that we | 
|  | are still waiting for CPUs 2 and 4 to check in for the | 
|  | current grace period. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	The characters separated by the ">" indicate the state | 
|  | of the blocked-tasks lists.  A "T" preceding the ">" | 
|  | indicates that at least one task blocked in an RCU | 
|  | read-side critical section blocks the current grace | 
|  | period, while a "." preceding the ">" indicates otherwise. | 
|  | The character following the ">" indicates similarly for | 
|  | the next grace period.  A "T" should appear in this | 
|  | field only for rcu-preempt. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	The numbers separated by the ":" are the range of CPUs | 
|  | served by this struct rcu_node.  This can be helpful | 
|  | in working out how the hierarchy is wired together. | 
|  |  | 
|  | For example, the first entry at the lowest level shows | 
|  | "0:5", indicating that it covers CPUs 0 through 5. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	The number after the "^" indicates the bit in the | 
|  | next higher level rcu_node structure that this | 
|  | rcu_node structure corresponds to. | 
|  |  | 
|  | For example, the first entry at the lowest level shows | 
|  | "^0", indicating that it corresponds to bit zero in | 
|  | the first entry at the middle level. | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | The output of "cat rcu/rcu_pending" looks as follows: | 
|  |  | 
|  | rcu_sched: | 
|  | 0 np=255892 qsp=53936 cbr=0 cng=14417 gpc=10033 gps=24320 nf=6445 nn=146741 | 
|  | 1 np=261224 qsp=54638 cbr=0 cng=25723 gpc=16310 gps=2849 nf=5912 nn=155792 | 
|  | 2 np=237496 qsp=49664 cbr=0 cng=2762 gpc=45478 gps=1762 nf=1201 nn=136629 | 
|  | 3 np=236249 qsp=48766 cbr=0 cng=286 gpc=48049 gps=1218 nf=207 nn=137723 | 
|  | 4 np=221310 qsp=46850 cbr=0 cng=26 gpc=43161 gps=4634 nf=3529 nn=123110 | 
|  | 5 np=237332 qsp=48449 cbr=0 cng=54 gpc=47920 gps=3252 nf=201 nn=137456 | 
|  | 6 np=219995 qsp=46718 cbr=0 cng=50 gpc=42098 gps=6093 nf=4202 nn=120834 | 
|  | 7 np=249893 qsp=49390 cbr=0 cng=72 gpc=38400 gps=17102 nf=41 nn=144888 | 
|  | rcu_bh: | 
|  | 0 np=146741 qsp=1419 cbr=0 cng=6 gpc=0 gps=0 nf=2 nn=145314 | 
|  | 1 np=155792 qsp=12597 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=4 gps=8 nf=3 nn=143180 | 
|  | 2 np=136629 qsp=18680 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=7 gps=6 nf=0 nn=117936 | 
|  | 3 np=137723 qsp=2843 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=10 gps=7 nf=0 nn=134863 | 
|  | 4 np=123110 qsp=12433 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=4 gps=2 nf=0 nn=110671 | 
|  | 5 np=137456 qsp=4210 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=5 nf=0 nn=133235 | 
|  | 6 np=120834 qsp=9902 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=3 nf=2 nn=110921 | 
|  | 7 np=144888 qsp=26336 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=8 gps=2 nf=0 nn=118542 | 
|  |  | 
|  | As always, this is once again split into "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh" | 
|  | portions, with CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels having an additional | 
|  | "rcu_preempt" section.  The fields are as follows: | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"np" is the number of times that __rcu_pending() has been invoked | 
|  | for the corresponding flavor of RCU. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"qsp" is the number of times that the RCU was waiting for a | 
|  | quiescent state from this CPU. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"cbr" is the number of times that this CPU had RCU callbacks | 
|  | that had passed through a grace period, and were thus ready | 
|  | to be invoked. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"cng" is the number of times that this CPU needed another | 
|  | grace period while RCU was idle. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"gpc" is the number of times that an old grace period had | 
|  | completed, but this CPU was not yet aware of it. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"gps" is the number of times that a new grace period had started, | 
|  | but this CPU was not yet aware of it. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"nf" is the number of times that this CPU suspected that the | 
|  | current grace period had run for too long, and thus needed to | 
|  | be forced. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Please note that "forcing" consists of sending resched IPIs | 
|  | to holdout CPUs.  If that CPU really still is in an old RCU | 
|  | read-side critical section, then we really do have to wait for it. | 
|  | The assumption behing "forcing" is that the CPU is not still in | 
|  | an old RCU read-side critical section, but has not yet responded | 
|  | for some other reason. | 
|  |  | 
|  | o	"nn" is the number of times that this CPU needed nothing.  Alert | 
|  | readers will note that the rcu "nn" number for a given CPU very | 
|  | closely matches the rcu_bh "np" number for that same CPU.  This | 
|  | is due to short-circuit evaluation in rcu_pending(). |