locks: give posix_test_lock same interface as ->lock
posix_test_lock() and ->lock() do the same job but have gratuitously
different interfaces. Modify posix_test_lock() so the two agree,
simplifying some code in the process.
Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
diff --git a/fs/lockd/svclock.c b/fs/lockd/svclock.c
index cf51f84..97b0160 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/svclock.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/svclock.c
@@ -426,15 +426,18 @@
(long long)lock->fl.fl_start,
(long long)lock->fl.fl_end);
- if (posix_test_lock(file->f_file, &lock->fl, &conflock->fl)) {
+ if (posix_test_lock(file->f_file, &lock->fl)) {
dprintk("lockd: conflicting lock(ty=%d, %Ld-%Ld)\n",
- conflock->fl.fl_type,
- (long long)conflock->fl.fl_start,
- (long long)conflock->fl.fl_end);
+ lock->fl.fl_type,
+ (long long)lock->fl.fl_start,
+ (long long)lock->fl.fl_end);
conflock->caller = "somehost"; /* FIXME */
conflock->len = strlen(conflock->caller);
conflock->oh.len = 0; /* don't return OH info */
- conflock->svid = conflock->fl.fl_pid;
+ conflock->svid = lock->fl.fl_pid;
+ conflock->fl.fl_type = lock->fl.fl_type;
+ conflock->fl.fl_start = lock->fl.fl_start;
+ conflock->fl.fl_end = lock->fl.fl_end;
return nlm_lck_denied;
}