ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig
index 026b4b2..f8eecb9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig
@@ -4,12 +4,12 @@
bool
config CP_INTC
- select IRQ_DOMAIN
bool
+ select IRQ_DOMAIN
config ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx
- select CPU_ARM926T
bool
+ select CPU_ARM926T
menu "TI DaVinci Implementations"
@@ -32,19 +32,19 @@
config ARCH_DAVINCI_DA830
bool "DA830/OMAP-L137/AM17x based system"
- select CP_INTC
select ARCH_DAVINCI_DA8XX
select CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH # needed on silicon revs 1.0, 1.1
+ select CP_INTC
config ARCH_DAVINCI_DA850
bool "DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18x based system"
- select CP_INTC
select ARCH_DAVINCI_DA8XX
select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ
+ select CP_INTC
config ARCH_DAVINCI_DA8XX
- select CPU_ARM926T
bool
+ select CPU_ARM926T
config ARCH_DAVINCI_DM365
bool "DaVinci 365 based system"
@@ -52,9 +52,9 @@
select ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx
config ARCH_DAVINCI_TNETV107X
+ bool "TNETV107X based system"
select CPU_V6
select CP_INTC
- bool "TNETV107X based system"
comment "DaVinci Board Type"
@@ -103,9 +103,9 @@
bool "TI DM6467 EVM"
default ARCH_DAVINCI_DM646x
depends on ARCH_DAVINCI_DM646x
- select MACH_DAVINCI_DM6467TEVM
select EEPROM_AT24
select I2C
+ select MACH_DAVINCI_DM6467TEVM
help
Configure this option to specify the whether the board used
for development is a DM6467 EVM
@@ -127,8 +127,8 @@
bool "TI DA830/OMAP-L137/AM17x Reference Platform"
default ARCH_DAVINCI_DA830
depends on ARCH_DAVINCI_DA830
- select GPIO_PCF857X
select EEPROM_AT24
+ select GPIO_PCF857X
select I2C
help
Say Y here to select the TI DA830/OMAP-L137/AM17x Evaluation Module.