| Futex Requeue PI | 
 | ---------------- | 
 |  | 
 | Requeueing of tasks from a non-PI futex to a PI futex requires | 
 | special handling in order to ensure the underlying rt_mutex is never | 
 | left without an owner if it has waiters; doing so would break the PI | 
 | boosting logic [see rt-mutex-desgin.txt] For the purposes of | 
 | brevity, this action will be referred to as "requeue_pi" throughout | 
 | this document.  Priority inheritance is abbreviated throughout as | 
 | "PI". | 
 |  | 
 | Motivation | 
 | ---------- | 
 |  | 
 | Without requeue_pi, the glibc implementation of | 
 | pthread_cond_broadcast() must resort to waking all the tasks waiting | 
 | on a pthread_condvar and letting them try to sort out which task | 
 | gets to run first in classic thundering-herd formation.  An ideal | 
 | implementation would wake the highest-priority waiter, and leave the | 
 | rest to the natural wakeup inherent in unlocking the mutex | 
 | associated with the condvar. | 
 |  | 
 | Consider the simplified glibc calls: | 
 |  | 
 | /* caller must lock mutex */ | 
 | pthread_cond_wait(cond, mutex) | 
 | { | 
 | 	lock(cond->__data.__lock); | 
 | 	unlock(mutex); | 
 | 	do { | 
 | 	   unlock(cond->__data.__lock); | 
 | 	   futex_wait(cond->__data.__futex); | 
 | 	   lock(cond->__data.__lock); | 
 | 	} while(...) | 
 | 	unlock(cond->__data.__lock); | 
 | 	lock(mutex); | 
 | } | 
 |  | 
 | pthread_cond_broadcast(cond) | 
 | { | 
 | 	lock(cond->__data.__lock); | 
 | 	unlock(cond->__data.__lock); | 
 | 	futex_requeue(cond->data.__futex, cond->mutex); | 
 | } | 
 |  | 
 | Once pthread_cond_broadcast() requeues the tasks, the cond->mutex | 
 | has waiters. Note that pthread_cond_wait() attempts to lock the | 
 | mutex only after it has returned to user space.  This will leave the | 
 | underlying rt_mutex with waiters, and no owner, breaking the | 
 | previously mentioned PI-boosting algorithms. | 
 |  | 
 | In order to support PI-aware pthread_condvar's, the kernel needs to | 
 | be able to requeue tasks to PI futexes.  This support implies that | 
 | upon a successful futex_wait system call, the caller would return to | 
 | user space already holding the PI futex.  The glibc implementation | 
 | would be modified as follows: | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | /* caller must lock mutex */ | 
 | pthread_cond_wait_pi(cond, mutex) | 
 | { | 
 | 	lock(cond->__data.__lock); | 
 | 	unlock(mutex); | 
 | 	do { | 
 | 	   unlock(cond->__data.__lock); | 
 | 	   futex_wait_requeue_pi(cond->__data.__futex); | 
 | 	   lock(cond->__data.__lock); | 
 | 	} while(...) | 
 | 	unlock(cond->__data.__lock); | 
 |         /* the kernel acquired the the mutex for us */ | 
 | } | 
 |  | 
 | pthread_cond_broadcast_pi(cond) | 
 | { | 
 | 	lock(cond->__data.__lock); | 
 | 	unlock(cond->__data.__lock); | 
 | 	futex_requeue_pi(cond->data.__futex, cond->mutex); | 
 | } | 
 |  | 
 | The actual glibc implementation will likely test for PI and make the | 
 | necessary changes inside the existing calls rather than creating new | 
 | calls for the PI cases.  Similar changes are needed for | 
 | pthread_cond_timedwait() and pthread_cond_signal(). | 
 |  | 
 | Implementation | 
 | -------------- | 
 |  | 
 | In order to ensure the rt_mutex has an owner if it has waiters, it | 
 | is necessary for both the requeue code, as well as the waiting code, | 
 | to be able to acquire the rt_mutex before returning to user space. | 
 | The requeue code cannot simply wake the waiter and leave it to | 
 | acquire the rt_mutex as it would open a race window between the | 
 | requeue call returning to user space and the waiter waking and | 
 | starting to run.  This is especially true in the uncontended case. | 
 |  | 
 | The solution involves two new rt_mutex helper routines, | 
 | rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() and rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(), which | 
 | allow the requeue code to acquire an uncontended rt_mutex on behalf | 
 | of the waiter and to enqueue the waiter on a contended rt_mutex. | 
 | Two new system calls provide the kernel<->user interface to | 
 | requeue_pi: FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI and FUTEX_REQUEUE_CMP_PI. | 
 |  | 
 | FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI is called by the waiter (pthread_cond_wait() | 
 | and pthread_cond_timedwait()) to block on the initial futex and wait | 
 | to be requeued to a PI-aware futex.  The implementation is the | 
 | result of a high-speed collision between futex_wait() and | 
 | futex_lock_pi(), with some extra logic to check for the additional | 
 | wake-up scenarios. | 
 |  | 
 | FUTEX_REQUEUE_CMP_PI is called by the waker | 
 | (pthread_cond_broadcast() and pthread_cond_signal()) to requeue and | 
 | possibly wake the waiting tasks. Internally, this system call is | 
 | still handled by futex_requeue (by passing requeue_pi=1).  Before | 
 | requeueing, futex_requeue() attempts to acquire the requeue target | 
 | PI futex on behalf of the top waiter.  If it can, this waiter is | 
 | woken.  futex_requeue() then proceeds to requeue the remaining | 
 | nr_wake+nr_requeue tasks to the PI futex, calling | 
 | rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() prior to each requeue to prepare the | 
 | task as a waiter on the underlying rt_mutex.  It is possible that | 
 | the lock can be acquired at this stage as well, if so, the next | 
 | waiter is woken to finish the acquisition of the lock. | 
 |  | 
 | FUTEX_REQUEUE_PI accepts nr_wake and nr_requeue as arguments, but | 
 | their sum is all that really matters.  futex_requeue() will wake or | 
 | requeue up to nr_wake + nr_requeue tasks.  It will wake only as many | 
 | tasks as it can acquire the lock for, which in the majority of cases | 
 | should be 0 as good programming practice dictates that the caller of | 
 | either pthread_cond_broadcast() or pthread_cond_signal() acquire the | 
 | mutex prior to making the call. FUTEX_REQUEUE_PI requires that | 
 | nr_wake=1.  nr_requeue should be INT_MAX for broadcast and 0 for | 
 | signal. |