x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping between 32 and 64bit

The mapping between cpu/apicid and node is done via
apicid_to_node[] on 64bit and apicid_2_node[] +
apic->x86_32_numa_cpu_node() on 32bit. This difference makes it
difficult to further unify 32 and 64bit NUMA handling.

This patch unifies it by replacing both apicid_to_node[] and
apicid_2_node[] with __apicid_to_node[] array, which is accessed
by two accessors - set_apicid_to_node() and numa_cpu_node().  On
64bit, numa_cpu_node() always consults __apicid_to_node[]
directly while 32bit goes through apic->numa_cpu_node() method
to allow apic implementations to override it.

srat_detect_node() for amd cpus contains workaround for broken
NUMA configuration which assumes relationship between APIC ID,
HT node ID and NUMA topology.  Leave it to access
__apicid_to_node[] directly as mapping through CPU might result
in undesirable behavior change.  The comment is reformatted and
updated to note the ugliness.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Cc: yinghai@kernel.org
Cc: brgerst@gmail.com
Cc: gorcunov@gmail.com
Cc: shaohui.zheng@intel.com
Cc: rientjes@google.com
LKML-Reference: <1295789862-25482-14-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
index f21962c..c7fae38 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@
 		__acpi_map_pxm_to_node(nid, i);
 #endif
 	}
-	memcpy(apicid_to_node, fake_apicid_to_node, sizeof(apicid_to_node));
+	memcpy(__apicid_to_node, fake_apicid_to_node, sizeof(__apicid_to_node));
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_EMU */
 
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@
 				nodes[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
 				nodes[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
 		for (j = apicid_base; j < cores + apicid_base; j++)
-			apicid_to_node[(i << bits) + j] = i;
+			set_apicid_to_node((i << bits) + j, i);
 		setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
 	}